摘要
AIM:To investigate the efficacy and safety of propofol sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP).METHODS:Databases including PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials updated as of October 2010 were searched.Main outcome measures were ERCP procedure duration,recovery time,incidence of hypotension and hypoxia.RESULTS:Six trials with a total of 663 patients were included.The pooled mean difference in ERCP procedure duration between the propofol and traditional sedative agents was-8.05(95%CI:-16.74 to 0.63),with no significant difference between the groups.Thepooled mean difference in the recovery time was-18.69(95%CI:-25.44 to-11.93),which showed a significant reduction with use of propofol sedation.Compared with traditional sedative agents,the pooled OR with propofol sedation for ERCP causing hypotension or hypoxia was 1.69(95%CI:0.82-3.50)and 0.90(95%CI:0.55-1.49),respectively,which indicated no significant difference between the groups.CONCLUSION:Propofol sedation during ERCP leads to shorter recovery time without an increase of cardiopulmonary side effects.Propofol sedation can provide adequate sedation during ERCP.
AIM： To investigate the efficacy and safety of propofol sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP）. METHODS： Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials updated as of October 2010 were searched. Main outcome measures were ERCP procedure duration, recovery time, incidence of hypotension and hypoxia. RESULTS： Six trials with a total of 663 patients were included. The pooled mean difference in ERCP procedure duration between the propofol and traditional sedative agents was -8.05 （95% CI： -16.74 to 0.63）, with no significant difference between the groups. The pooled mean difference in the recovery time was -18.69 （95% CI： -25.44 to -11.93）, which showed a significant reduction with use of propofol sedation. Compared with traditional sedative agents, the pooled OR with propofol sedation for ERCP causing hypotension or hypoxia was 1.69 （95% CI： 0.82-3.50） and 0.90 （95% CI： 0.55-1.49）, respectively, which indicated no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION： Propofol sedation during ERCP leads to shorter recovery time without an increase of cardiopulmonary side effects. Propofol sedation can provide adequate sedation during ERCP.
基金
Supported by The grants from the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of Changhai Hospital,Shanghai,China
