期刊文献+

Update of cholangioscopy and biliary strictures 被引量:1

Update of cholangioscopy and biliary strictures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Cholangioscopy remains another modality in the investigation of biliary strictures. At cholangioscopy, the"tumour vessel" sign is considered a specific sign formalignancy. Through its ability to not only visualisemucosa, but to take targeted biopsies, it has a greater accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for malignant strictures than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided cytopathological acquisition. Cholangioscopy however, is time consuming and costly, requires greater technical expertise, and should be reserved for the investigation of undifferentiated strictures after standard investigations have failed. Cholangioscopy remains another modality in the investigation of biliary strictures. At cholangioscopy, the"tumour vessel" sign is considered a specific sign formalignancy. Through its ability to not only visualisemucosa, but to take targeted biopsies, it has a greater accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for malignant strictures than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided cytopathological acquisition. Cholangioscopy however, is time consuming and costly, requires greater technical expertise, and should be reserved for the investigation of undifferentiated strictures after standard investigations have failed.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第34期3864-3869,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Reinus WR, Shady K, Lind M, Scott R. Ultrasound evaluation of the common duct in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Am J Gastroentero11992; 87:489-492.
  • 2Thornton JR, Lobo AJ, Lintott DJ, Axon AT. Value of ultrasound and liver function tests in determining the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in unexplained abdominal pain. Gut 1992; 33:1559-1561.
  • 3Wachsberg RH, Kim KH, Sundaram K. Sonographic versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiographic measurements of the bile duct revisited: importance of the transverse diameter. A JR Am JRoentgeno11998; 170:669-674.
  • 4Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW, Park SW, Lee JK, Kim JS, Lee JH, Kim KA, Kim AY, Kim PN, Lee MG, Ha HK. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 2004; 233: 234-240.
  • 5Slattery JM, Sahani DV. What is the current state-of-the-art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist 2006; 11:913-922.
  • 6Rosch T, Meining A, Frithmorgen S, Zillinger C, Schusdziarra V, Hellerhoff K, Classen M, Helmberger H. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 870-876.
  • 7Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F, Labadie M, Liaras A, Chavaillon A, Bory R. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 565-572.
  • 8Venu RP, Geenen JE, Kini M, Hogan WJ, Payne M, Johnson GK, Schmalz MJ. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. A new technique. Gastroenterology 1990; 99:1475-1479.
  • 9Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, Matthewson K. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997; 40:671-677.
  • 10Stewart CJ, Mills PR, Carter R, O'Donohue J, Fullarton G, Irnrie CW, Murray WR. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases. J Clin Patho12001; 54:449455.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部