期刊文献+

慢性肾功能损伤的肝移植受者转换为西罗莫司治疗的疗效观察 被引量:3

The curative effect of sirolimus conversion for liver transplantation patients with chronic renal injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察慢性肾功能损伤的肝移植受者转换为西罗莫司治疗的疗效。方法应用钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)并伴有慢性肾功能损伤的肝移植受者23例(其中19例应用他克莫司,4例应用环孢素A)转换为西罗莫司(SRL)治疗。SRL的起始剂量为4mg/d,次日为2mg/d,应用高压液相色谱法测定全血SRL浓度,当血SRL浓度达5~8μg/L后,停用CNI类药物,同时服用吗替麦考酚酯,1g/d。记录受者入组前的基础血清肌酐(cr)、肌酐清除率、肾小球滤过率(GFR),并分别于用药后第1、3、6、12和24个月时监测血SRL浓度、Cr、肌酐清除率、GFR,同时监测受者体重、血压、血细胞计数、肝功能和肝脏生化指标、血脂、尿蛋白。于用药后12个月时行肝脏穿刺活检确认有无排斥反应。结果23例平均随访29.4个月,随访期内死亡2例,另21例于用药后1、3、6、12和24月时的Cr分另U为(147.40±23.36)、(152.60±20.08)、(1S0.20±22.64)、(137.60±18.09)、(138.30±17.04)μmol/L,与cr的基础值[(158.91±29.13)μmol/L]相比较,1、12、24个月时的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。用药后1、3、6、12和24月时的肌酐清除率分别为(0.97±0.18)、(0.99±0.14)、(1.00±0.17)、(1.07±0.29)、(1.14±0.12)ml/s,与基础肌酐清除率[(0.91±0.14)ml/s]相比较,1、12、24个月时的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。用药后1、3、6、12和24月时的GFR分别为(0.80±0.15)、(0.78±0.11)、(0.75±0.12)、(0.84±0.10)、(0.94±0.13),与基础GFR[(0.71±0.11)ml/s]相比较,1、12、24个月时的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。应用SRL后第1、3、6、12和24个月时,Cr≤123μmol/L者所占的比例分别为38.1%、33.3%、28.6%、47.6%和52.4%。随访期内无受者发生排斥反应。结论慢性肾功能损伤的肝移植受者转换为西罗莫司治疗可改善其肾功能。转换治疗未增加排斥反应的发生率。 Objective To observe the curative effect of sirolimus conversion for liver transplantation patients with chronic renal injury. Methods In 23 recipients of liver transplantation using CNI (19 cases using tacrolimus, and 4 cases using cyclosporine A) with chronic renal injury, the immunosuppressant was converted to sirolimus (SRL). The initial dose of SRL was 4 mg per day and 2 mg at the next day. The blood SRL concentration was determined by using high pressure liquid chromatography. When the valley value of SRL concentration reached a range between 5 to 8 μg/L, CNI was withdrawn and MMF (1 g/day) was given simultaneously. The basal values of serum creatinine (Scr), creatinie clearance rate (Ccr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were recorded in the recipients before study, and at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after using SRL, blood SRL concentration, Scr, Ccr and GFR, as well as body weight, blood pressure, blood cells count, liver function (serum bilirubin, albumin and prothrombin time), liver biochemistry (AST, ALT, γ-GT and AKP), blood fat (cholesterol and triglyceride) and urine protein were monitored. At the 12th month after using SRL, the graft liver was biopsied to diagnosis rejection. Results During an average follow- up period of 29. 4 months, there were two deaths. In the remaining 21 cases, the Scr values were (147.40 ± 23. 36), (152. 60 ±20. 08), (150. 20 ± 22. 64), ( 137.60 ± 18. 09) and (138. 30 ± 17.04)μmol/L, respectively at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th month after using SRL. As compared with basal Scr values [(158. 91 ± 29. 13) μmol/L], there were statistically significant differences at 1st, 12th, 24th month (P〈0. 05). The Ccr values were (0.97 ± 0. 18), (0. 99 ± 0. 14), (1.00 ±0. 17), (1.07 ± 0. 29) and (1.14±0. 12) ml/s, respectively at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th month after using SRL. As compared with basal Ccr value [(0. 91 ± 0. 14) ml/s], there were statistically significant differences at 1st, 12th, 24th month (P〈0. 05). The GFR values were (0. 80 ± 0. 15), (0. 78 ± 0. 11), (0. 75 ± 0. 12), (0. 84±0. 10) and (0. 94±0. 13) ml/s, at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th month after using SRL. As compared with basal GFR value [(0.71 ± 0. 11) ml/s], there were statistically significant differences at 1st, 12th, 24th month (P〈0. 05). The proportion of patients with Scr≤123μmol/L in 21 cases was 38. 1%, 33.3 %, 28. 6 %, 47. 6 % and 52. 4%, respectively at 1st, 12th, 24th month (P〈0.05). No rejection cases were observed. Conclusion The immunosuppressant conversion to SRL improves renal function of liver transplantation patients with chronic renal injury, and the conversion cure can not cause rejection.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期668-671,共4页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 肝移植 肾功能衰竭 慢性 西罗莫司 Liver transplantation Kidney failure, chronic Sirolimus
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, et al. Chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation: Recent evidence. Int J Artif Organs, 2010, 33(11) :803-811.
  • 2Pawarode A, Fine DM, Thuluvath PJ. Independent risk factors and natural history of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(7):741-747.
  • 3Fisher NC, Nightingale PG, Gunson BK, et al. Chronic renal failure following liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis. Transplantation, 1998, 66(1) :59-66.
  • 4Trunecka P, Adamec M, Spicdk J, et al. Long-term follow-up of the first 500 liver transplant recipients transplanted at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague. Cas Lek Cesk, 2011, 150(1 ) :60-67.
  • 5Falkenhain ME, Cosio FG, Sedmak DD. Progressive histologic injury in kidneys from heart and liver transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine. Transplantation, 1996, 62(3) :364-370.
  • 6Wilkinson A, Pham PT. Kidney dysfunction in the recipients of liver transplants. Liver Transpl, 2005,11 Suppl 2:S47-51.
  • 7Ramachandran J, Juneja R, John L, et al. Chronic kidney disease following liver transplantation: a South Australian experience. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(9):3644-3646.
  • 8王轩,吴幼民,许正昌,张斌,李增才,陆雷,郑以山.雷帕霉素在合并急性肾功能不全肝移植患者中的初步应用[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(30):2974-2976. 被引量:2
  • 9Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Sarwal M. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009, 4(2):481-508.
  • 10Hornberger TA, Sukhija KB, Wang XR, et al. mTOR is the rapamycin-sensitive kinase that confers mechanically-induced phosphorylation of the hydrophobic motif site Thr(389) in p70 (S6k). FEBS Letters, 2007, 581(24) :4562-4566.

二级参考文献15

  • 1First MR.Tacrolimus based immunosuppression.J Nephrol 2004; 17 Suppl 8:S25-31
  • 2Wlodarczyk Z,Vitko S,Salmela K,Czajkowski Z,Margreiter R.Lipid metabolism in renal transpl-ant patients receiving tacrolimus/sirolimus combination therapy.Transplant Proc 2005; 37:1871-1873
  • 3Maheshwari A,Mishra R,Thuluvath PJ.Post-livertransplant anemia:etiology and management.Liver Transpl 2004; 10:165-173
  • 4Junge G,Schewior LV,Kohler S,Neuhaus R,Langrehr JM,Tullius S,Kahl A,Frei U,Neuhaus P.Acute renal failure after liver transplantation:incidence,etiology,therapy,and outcome.Transplant Proc 2006; 38:723-724
  • 5Cabezuelo JB,Ramirez P,Rios A,Acosta F,Torres D,Sansano T,Pons JA,Bru M,Montoya M,Bueno FS,Robles R,Parrilla P.Risk factors of acute renal failure after liver transplantation.Kidney Int 2006;69:1073-1080
  • 6de Mattos AM,Olyaei AJ,Bennett WM.Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs:long-term consequences and challenges for the future.Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35:333-346
  • 7Emiroglu R,Ayvaz I,Moray G,Karakayali H,Haberal M.Tacrolimus-related neurologic and renal complications in liver transplantation:A singlecenter experience.Transplant Proc 2006; 38:619-621
  • 8Sehgal SN.Rapamune (RAPA,rapamycin,sirolimus):mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression.Clin Biochem 1998; 31:335-340
  • 9Sehgal SN.Sirolimus:its discovery,biological properties,and mechanism of action.Transplant Proc 2003; 35:7S-14S
  • 10Wu YM,Voigt M,Rayhill S,Katz D,Chenhsu RY,Schmidt W,Miller R,Mitros F,Labrecque D.Suprahepatic venacavaplasty (cavaplasty) with retrohepatic cava extension in liver transplantation:experience with first 115 cases.Transplantation 2001;72:1389-1394

共引文献1

同被引文献34

  • 1王轩,吴幼民,许正昌,张斌,李增才,陆雷,郑以山.雷帕霉素在合并急性肾功能不全肝移植患者中的初步应用[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(30):2974-2976. 被引量:2
  • 2阚彤,杨甲梅,严以群,吴孟超.前列腺素E1对大鼠肝移植肾功能的保护作用[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(5):366-368. 被引量:3
  • 3Weber ML, Lbrahim HN, Lake JR, et al. Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients: evaluation of the critical issues. Liver Transp1,2012,18 ( 11 ) : 1290-1301.
  • 4Sharma P, Welch K, Eikstadt R, et al. Renal outcomes after liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era. Liver Transp1,2009,15 (9) : 1142-1148.
  • 5AI Riyami D, Alam A, Badovinac K, et al. Decreased survival in liver transplant patients requiring chronic dialysis: a Canadian experience. Transplantation, 2008,85 ( 9 ) : 1277-1280.
  • 6Garces G, Contreras G, Carvalho D, et al. Chronic kidney disease after orthotopic liver transplantation in recipients receiving tacroli- mus. Clinical Nephrology,2011,75(2) : 150-157.
  • 7Schmitz V, Laudi S, Moeckel F, et al. Chronic renal dysfunction following liver transplantation. Clin Transplant,2008,22(3) :333-340.
  • 8Baid S, Cosimi AB, Farrell ML, et al. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients: risk factor, temporal rela- tionship with hepatitis C virus allograft hepatitis, and impact on mortality. Transplantation,2001,72(6) :1066-1072.
  • 9Kubal C, Cockwell P, Gunson B, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nonrenal solid organ transplantation: a histological assessmentand utility of chronic allografi damage index scoring. Transplanta- tion,2012,93 (4) :406-411.
  • 10Calmus Y, Conti F, Cluzel P, et al. Prospective assessment of renal histopathological lesions in patients with end-stage liver dis- ease : effects on long-term renal function after liver transplantation. J I-Iepato1,2012,57 ( 3 ) :572-576.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部