期刊文献+

分子伴侣BiP结构域分析及对肝癌细胞增殖和凋亡的影响 被引量:5

Analysis on Molecular Chaperone BiP Domain and Influence on Proliferation and Apoptosis in Hepatoma Cells
原文传递
导出
摘要 结合免疫球蛋白(binding immunoglobulin protein,BiP),是Hsp70(70 kilodalton heatshock proteins)蛋白家族的成员之一,是内质网应激(endoplasmic reticulum stress,ERS)主要的调节器。为了研究BiP的分子结构与生物学功能的关系,首先,分析BiP的DNA序列和蛋白质空间构象,接着利用重叠PCR方法分别克隆ATPase结构域缺失体和peptide-binding结构域缺失体(BiPa和BiPp),成功构建带myc标签的真核表达载体,转染LO2细胞和SMMC-7721细胞,应用免疫印迹方法检测其在细胞内的表达;运用MTT法、BrdU免疫组化法及流式细胞仪分别检测细胞的增殖和凋亡;检测BiP及两个组成结构域对SMMC-7721细胞增殖和凋亡的影响。酶切、电泳和DNA测序结果显示,BiP全长和两个缺失体的真核表达载体构建成功;免疫印迹检测到BiP三种真核载体在LO2细胞和SMMC-7721细胞中均能正确表达;MTT和BrdU免疫组化结果表明,BiP全长和缺失体BiPa、BiPp三种真核载体均能有效促进SMMC-7721的增殖,各组间细胞增殖率结果分析提示ATPase功能域可能抑制细胞增殖,而peptide-binding结构域可能促进细胞的增殖;流式细胞仪结果显示,转染BiP、BiPa、BiPp三种真核载体均可以促进SMMC-7721的凋亡,缺失体BiPa与全长BiP组间凋亡率差异不显著;而缺失体BiPp组细胞凋亡率明显低于全长BiP组,两组差异具有显著性(P<0.05);提示ATPase功能域与细胞凋亡可能不相关,而peptide-binding结构域可能促进细胞的凋亡。上述结果表明,BiP的两个组成结构域:ATPase功能域与peptide-binding结构域,独立存在或者共同存在时,调控细胞增殖与凋亡具有差异性;当两个结构域共同存在时,它们会协同调控细胞的增殖与凋亡,具体的分子机制还需要进一步的实验研究和探讨。 Binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) lator for Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (ERS). To study is a resident member of Hsp70 family and master regu- the relationship of Bip domain with the physiological function, BiP DNA sequence and protein structure were analysed, two deletion mutants of BiP and BiP full-length eukaryotic expression vectors with myc tag were successfully constructed with the method of overlapping PCR mutagenesis respectively. BiPa deletion mutant is BiP mutant with ATPase domain deleted, BiPp deletion mutant is BiP mutant with peptide-binding domain deleted. After these eukaryotic expression vectors were transfected into LO2 and SMMC-7721 cells, they were identified the expression by Western blot. Then cell proliferation and apoptosis were analysed by MTT assay, BrdU immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry (FCM) respectively, next the relationship between cell proliferation/apoptosis and BiP/BiPa/BiPp were also analysed. Both the full-length BiP and the deletion mutants BiPa, BiPp can effectively improve SMMC-7721 cells proliferation by MTT assay and BrdU immuno-histochemistry. Besides, every group of cell proliferation rate results showed that ATPase domain might be inhibit cell growth, while peptide-binding domain might be increase cell growth. FCM results showed that both the full-length BiP and the deletion mutants BiPa, BiPp can enhance SMMC-7721 cells apoptosis. The difference of apoptosis rate between group BiPa and group BiP were no significance, however, the apoptosis rate of group BiPp was clearly lower than group BiP (P〈0.05). It was showed that ATPase domain might be unconcerned with cell apoptosis, while peptide-binding domain might be increase cell apoptosis. These two domains, ATPase and peptide-binding, can coregulate cell proliferation and cell poptosis when they combined with each other. The molecular mechanism of them need to be studied deeply.
出处 《中国细胞生物学学报》 CAS CSCD 2011年第11期1204-1212,共9页 Chinese Journal of Cell Biology
基金 国家自然基金(No.31040019) 教育部留学人员基金(No.2009-1590)资助项目~~
关键词 BIP 缺失体 生物信息学 细胞增殖 BiP deletion bioinformatics cell proliferation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Dudek J, Benedix J, Cappel S, Greiner M, Jalal C, Muller L, et al. Functions and pathologies of BiP and its interaction partners. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66(9): 1556-69.
  • 2Guo FJ, Lin EA, Liu P, Lin J, Liu C. XBP1U inhibits the XBP1S- mediated upregulation of the iNOS gene expression in mamma- lian ER stress response. Cell Signal 2010; 22(12): 1818-28.
  • 3Susuki S, Sato T, Miyata M, Momohara M, Suico MA, Shuto T, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of tran-sthyretin variants is negatively regulated by BiP in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2009; 284(13): 8312-21.
  • 4Gorbatyuk MS, Knox T, LaVail MM, Gorbatyuk OS, Noorwez SM, Hauswirth WW, et al. Restoration of visual function in P23H rhodopsin transgenic rats by gene delivery of BiP/Grp78.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107(13): 5961-6.
  • 5Heckman KL, Pease LR. Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc 2007; 2(4): 924-32.
  • 6Kiang JG, Tsokos GC. Heat shock protein 70 kDa: Molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology. Pharmacol Ther 1998; 80(2): 183-201.
  • 7Chevalier M, King L,Wang C, Gething M J, Elguindi E, Blond SY. Substrate binding induces depolymerization of the C-terminal peptide binding domain of murine GRP78/BiP. J Biol Chem 1998; 273(41): 26827-35.
  • 8Wisniewska M, Karlberg T, Lehtio L, Johansson I, Kotenyova T, Moche M, et al. Crystal structures of the ATPase domains of fourhuman Hsp70 isoforms: HSPA1L/Hsp70-hom, HSPA2/Hsp70-2, HSPA6/Hsp70B', and HSPA5/BiP/GRP78. PLoS One 2010; 5(1): e8625.
  • 9Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure ho- mology modelling. Bioinfor-matics 2006; 22(2): 195-201.
  • 10Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31(13): 3381-5.

同被引文献48

  • 1Quinones QJ, de Ridder GG, Pizzo SV. GRP78: a chaper- one with diverse roles beyond the endoplasmic reticulum. Histol Histopathol, 2008, 23(11): 1409-1416.
  • 2Li J, Lee AS. Stress induction of GRP78/BiP and its role in cancer. Curr Mol Med, 2006, 6(1): 45-54.
  • 3Gonzalez-Gronow M, Selim MA, Papalas J, Pizzo SV. GRP78: a multifunctional receptor on the cell surface. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2009, 11(9): 2299-2306.
  • 4Otero JH, Lizfik B, Hendershot LM. Life and death of a BiP substrate. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2010, 21 (5): 472-478.
  • 5Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutat Res, 2005, 569(1-2): 29-63.
  • 6Oikawa D, Tokuda M, Hosoda A, Iwawaki T. Identifica- tion of a consensus element recognized and cleaved by IRE1α. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010, 38(18): 6265-6273.
  • 7Sha HB, He Y, Chen H, Wang C, Zenno A, Shi H, Yang XY, Zhang XM, Qi L. The IRE1α-XBP1 pathway of the unfolded protein response is required for adipogenesis. Cell Metab, 2009, 9(6): 556-564.
  • 8Rutkowski DT, Kaufman RJ. A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol, 2004, 14(1): 20-28.
  • 9Wu J, Kaufman RJ. From acute ER stress to physiological roles of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell Death Differ, 2006, 13(3): 374-84.
  • 10Kimata Y, Oikawa D, Shimizu Y, Ishiwata-Kimata Y, Kohno K. A role for BiP as an adjustor for the endoplas- mic reticulum stress-sensing protein Irel. J Cell Biol, 2004, 167(3): 445-456.

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部