期刊文献+

右美托咪定对急性心理应激的免疫保护作用 被引量:10

Immunoprotection of dexmedetomidine from acute psychological stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探索右美托咪定在局麻手术中对急性心理应激的免疫保护作用。[方法]择期局麻下行乳腺包块切除术的病人80例,随机平分为两组。实验组在局麻的同时复合静脉泵注右美托咪定;对照组只行局麻。两组病人均于术前及术毕时抽血检测CD4、CD8,行VAS疼痛评分、SCL-90心理评估,随访术后并发症。[结果]右美托咪定组术后SCL-90评分(110.15±11.87)及VAS评分(0.33±0.32)低于对照组的(163.17±20.17)和(3.65±0.24),术后CD8(28.11±1.34)低于对照组的(31.25±1.70),CD4/CD8(1.53±0.17)高于对照组的(1.43±0.15),差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。[结论]右美托咪定对局麻手术中的急性心理应激有免疫保护作用。 [ Objective] To study the immunoprotective effect of dexmedetomidine on acute psychological stress in local anesthesia surgery. [ Methods ] Eighty patients undergoing mammary gland block ectomy were divided into two groups randomly. Experimental group received local anesthesia and dexmedetomidine and control group took local anesthesia only. CD4 and CDs levels were examined in preoperative and postoperative periods, VAS pain score and SCL -90 psychological assessment were performed. Both the two groups of patients received postoperative follow - up for complications. [ Result] Postoperative SCL - 90 grade ( 110.15 ± 11.87 ), VAS score (0.33 ± 0.32) and the CD8 ( 28.11±1.34) level of experimental group were lower than these in control group ( 163.17 ± 20.17,3.65 ±0.24,31.25± 1.70 ), while CD4/CD8 ( 1.53 ± 0.17) was higher than that in control group( 1.43±0.15) (P 〈0.05). [ Conclusions] Dexmedetomidine can protest the acute psychological stress response by the way of regulating immune function.
出处 《大连医科大学学报》 CAS 2011年第5期479-482,共4页 Journal of Dalian Medical University
关键词 右美托咪定 心理应激 免疫保护 dexmedetomidine psychological stress immunoprotection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1田传胜,孙菲,王生.急性和重复性心理应激对大鼠血清皮质酮和免疫组织中糖皮质激素受体的影响[J].中国职业医学,2008,35(6):468-470. 被引量:3
  • 2张广华,李锦成,李健森,郭兵,高鲁渤.全麻下乳腺癌根治术对患者免疫系统的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2008,14(2):210-214. 被引量:3
  • 3丁晓燕,王旭东.围手术期乳腺癌患者的心理应激对免疫的影响[J].光明中医,2010,25(4):601-602. 被引量:5
  • 4Depke M, Kiank C. Altered hepatic mRNA expression of immune response and apoptosis - associated genes after a- cute and chronic psychological stress in mice [ J ]. Molecu- lar Immunology,2009,46:3018 - 3028.
  • 5Dogan R, Erbek S. Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty [ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010,27:960 - 964.
  • 6Goksu S, Arik H, Demil~yurek S, et al. Effects of dexmedeto- midine infusion in patients undergoing functional endoscop- ic sinus surgery under local anaesthesia [ J ]. Eur J Anaes- thesiol, 2008,25 : 22 - 28.
  • 7Sanders RD, Hussel T, Maze M. Sedation and immunomodu- lation[ J]. Crit Care Clin,2009 ,25 :551 - 570.
  • 8Tasdogan M,Melnis D,Sut N,et al. Results of a pilot study on the effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine on inflamma- tory responses and intraabdominal pressure in severe sepsis [ J ]. Clin Anesth, 2009,21 : 394 - 400.
  • 9Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch P, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients : a random- ized trial [ J ]. JAMA,2009,301:489 - 499.

二级参考文献30

共引文献8

同被引文献90

引证文献10

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部