期刊文献+

带权定性影响图

QUALITATIVE INFLUENCE DIAGRAMS WITH WEIGHTS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 定性影响图是具有精确概率和效用的影响图的定性抽象。在定性影响图中,节点之间的影响关系使用定性符号描述,这种符号描述简化了不确定知识的表示,降低了影响图建模的难度,加速了不确定知识的推理。但是,定性影响图在抽象过程中损失了部分信息,导致定性影响图在评价过程中会产生不确定结果,阻碍了定性影响图的广泛应用。以加权的思想扩展定性影响图,使扩展的定性影响图中每个定性影响都带有一个表示节点间影响强弱的数值权值,在评价过程中根据定性影响权值的比较来减少不确定结果的产生,从而扩大定性影响图的应用范围。 Qualitative influence diagrams (QIDs) are the qualitative abstraction of influence diagrams (IDs) with precise probabilities and utilities. In a QID, the influences between nodes are expressed by the qualitative symbols which simplify uncertain knowledge representation, ease influence graphs modeling and accelerate uncertain knowledge reasoning. However, during the abstraction process, qualitative influence graphs lose partial information, resulting in ambiguous evaluation results which impede the extensive application of QIDs. QIDs are extended by attaching a numerical weight to each qualitative influence of QIDs so that the ambiguous evaluation results can be avoided by comparing corresponding weights. Therefore, the application of QIDs will be broadened.
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 CSCD 2011年第11期77-80,84,共5页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61063008) 云南省自然科学基金项目(2010CD025) 云南教育厅自然科学基金(09Y 0048)
关键词 影响图 定性影响图 带权定性影响图 Influence diagrams Qualitative influence diagrams Qualitative influence diagrams with weights
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Howard R A, Matheson J E. Influence diagrams [J]. Decision Analysis,2005,2(3) :127 - 143.
  • 2Wellman M P. Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1990,44:257 -303.
  • 3岳昆,刘惟一.不确定性知识的定性表示、推理及其应用——定性概率网研究综述[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(6):560-570. 被引量:5
  • 4Kouwen F, Renooij S, Schot P. Inference in qualitative probabilistic networks revisited [J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2009,50:708 -720.
  • 5Ibrahim Z, Tawfik A, Ngom A. Surprised-based qualitative probabilistic networks [C]//European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty,2009:228 - 239.
  • 6Li X K, Liao S H. Hierarchical reasoning in QPNs based on network decomposition[C]//International Conf. of Intelligent Contral and Information Processing, 2010:97 - 200.
  • 7Yue K, Yao Y, Li J, et al. Qualitative probabilistic networks with reduced ambiguities [ J ]. International Journal of Applied Intelligence, 2010,33(2) :159 - 178.
  • 8Renooij S, Linda C. Decision making in qualitative influence diagrams [C]//Proceeding of the Eleventh International FLAIRS Conf. 1998 : 410 -414.
  • 9Druzdzel M J, Henrion M. Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks [C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA. 1993:548 - 553.
  • 10Gaag L C V, Rnooij S, Witeerman C L M, et al. Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2002 (25) : 123 - 148.

二级参考文献6

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部