期刊文献+

论中日刑事司法改革与公民参与——以日本《裁判员法》为研究视角 被引量:1

Concerning the criminal judicial reform and the citizen's participation——on the Japan's Quasi-Jury Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以日本《裁判员法》的制定、颁布和施行过程为分析对象,我们发现日本的刑事司法改革注重吸收普通民众的参与。这种公民参与司法的理念对于当下中国的刑事司法改革特别重要,在中国未来参与改革的主体、改革方式以及改革路径的选择方面都有极大的借鉴意义。 Analyse the formulation, enacting and implementation of the Japan's Quasi- Jury Law, we find the criminal judi- cial reform in Japan calls for the participation of ordinary citizens. It is extraordinary vital for China' s reform and we can learn from it in the body involved in the reform, the reformatory approach and the choice of criminal judicial reforming way.
作者 柴煜峰
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2011年第6期44-49,共6页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 日本《裁判员法》 司法改革 公民参与司法 the Japan's Quasi- Jury Law judicial reform the citizen's participation in judicial process
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Daniel Senger.The Japanese Quasi-Jury And The American Jury:A Comparative Assessment Of Juror Questioning And Sentencing Procedures And Cultural Elements In Lay Judicial Participation. U.Ill.L.Rev . 2011
  • 2Justice System Reform Council(JSRC).Recommendations Of The Justice System Reform Council:For A Justice System To Support Japan In The 21st Century. http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/judiciary/2001/0612report.html . 2001
  • 3Hiroshi Fukurai.People’’’’s Panels Vs.Imperial Hegemony:Japan’’’’s Twin Lay Justice Systems And The Future Of American Military Bases In Japan. Asian-Pac L.&Pol’’’’y J . 2010
  • 4Norimitsu Onishi.Japan Learns Dreaded Task of Jury Duty. N.Y.TIMES . 2007
  • 5Hiroshi Fukurai.The Rebirth of Japan’’’’’’’’s Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems:A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and the U.S. Cornell Int’’l L.J . 2007
  • 6MasamiIto.Lawmakers Question’’’’Saibanin’’’’System. Japan Times . 2009
  • 7Hiroko Tabuchi,Mark McDonald.In First Return to Japan Court,Jurors Convict and Sentence. N.Y.TIMES . 2009
  • 8Jeff Vize.Torture,Forced Confessions,And Inhuman Punishments:Human Rights Abuses In The Japanese Penal System. UCLA Pac Basin L.J . 2003
  • 9Hiroshi Fukurai.The Rebirth Of Japan’’’’s Petit Quasi-Jury And Grand Jury Systems:ACross-National Analysis Of Legal Consciousness And The Lay Participatory Experience In Japan And The U.S. Cornell Int’’’’l L.J . 2007
  • 10Hiroshi Fukurai.The Rebirth Of Japan’’’’s Petit Quasi-Jury And Grand Jury Systems:ACross-National Analysis Of Legal Consciousness And The Lay Participatory Experience In Japan And The U.S. Cornell Int’’’’l L.J . 2007

同被引文献18

  • 1田口守一,丁相顺.日本的陪审制度——"裁判员"制度[J].法律适用,2005(4):91-94. 被引量:24
  • 2李昌林.从制度上保证人民陪审员真正享有刑事裁判权——论人民陪审员制度的完善[J].现代法学,2007,29(1):148-153. 被引量:19
  • 3周强.深入推进人民陪审员制度改革促进司法为民司法公正[EB/OL].http://www.chinacourt.ors/article/detail/2015/04/id/1605295.shtml.最后访问日期:2016-01-05.
  • 4周恒宇.人民陪审员制度改革试点工作座谈会召开[EB/OL].http://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2015/11/id/1742629.shtml.最后访问日期:2016-01-05.
  • 5[德]拉德布鲁赫.《法学导论》[M].米健译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
  • 6胡夏冰.依法治国背景下的人民陪审制度改革(下)[N].人民法院报,2014-11-28(5).
  • 7贺小荣,何帆,危浪平.《人民陪审员制度改革试点工作实施办法》的理解与适用[N].人民法院报,2015-05-22(4).
  • 8刘计划.中国陪审制改革之检讨.该文收录于陈卫东主编.公民参与司法研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2011.
  • 9国家统计局.2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报(第1号)[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/201104/t20110428_30327.html.最后访问日期:2016-03-05.
  • 10[日]藤田政博.日本裁判员制度的实证研究.肖萍译.该文部分内容收录于何挺等编译.外国刑事司法实证研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部