大学生父亲依恋状况调查

An Investigation into the Father Attachment of College Students

目的了解当前大学生父亲依恋现状及影响因素。方法采用自编大学生父亲依恋问卷对重庆市371名大学生进行父亲依恋水平的调查。结果当前大学生的父亲依恋在6个维度上的得分均高于中值3;女生在依赖、支持维度上得分高于男生,在独立维度上得分低于男生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);与父母生活和与父亲生活学生在依赖、沟通上的得分高于与母亲生活学生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);与父母一起生活学生的沟通得分高于单亲家庭学生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);农村学生的独立、牵挂得分高于城市学生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);非贫困学生的依赖、沟通、支持得分高于贫困学生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);不同专业、不同年级及是否独生子女间在各维度上得分的差异均无统计学意义。结论大学生父亲依恋的程度较高;男生更独立,而女生更依赖父亲;家庭结构对父亲依恋有重要影响;农村大学生更独立,更牵挂父亲;非贫困家庭的大学生父亲依恋程度更高。

objective To explore the father attachment of college students and influencing factors. Method 371 college students in Chongqing were investigated with a self-designed questionnaire on father attachment. Resuits The scores on six dimensions were all higher than 3 in terms of father attachment of college students; female students had high scores than male students on the dimensions of reliance and support but the male students had a higher score in terms of independence, and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05 or P〈0.01） ; those students living with parents or a father had higher scores in reliance and communication than those with a mother, and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.01）; the score of com- munication was higher in students living with parents than that in those from single-parent families, and it showed statistically significant difference （P〈0.05）; the scores of independence and care in rural students were higher than those in urban students, and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05 or P〈0. 01）; the scores of reliance, communication and support in non-impoverished students were higher than those in impoverished students, and they suggested statistically significant differences （P〈0.01） ; the scores of every dimension in different majors and grades and whether being a single child suggested no statistically significant differences. Conclusion Father attachment of college students is relatively deep; male students are more independ- ent comparing with female students; family structure exerts a great influence on father attachment; rural students are more independent and attached to father; non-impoverished college students have deeper father attachment.