期刊文献+

基于岩体加卸载响应原理的强矿震危险性预测 被引量:3

Predicting the risk of strong mining-induced seismicity based on the rock load/unload response theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 以抚顺老虎台矿田为工程背景,采用加卸载响应比理论,开展强矿震预测技术应用研究.研究表明:0≤ML≤0.5矿震在各开采深度作为加卸载响应震级的预测效能均较好,对于阶段峰值震级的平均预测信度为0.72;ML≥1.4矿震作为加卸载响应震级,具有深度尺度效应,响应震级与开采深度成正比,一般小于预测震级0.5~1.0,对于阶段峰值震级的平均预测信度0.60;0.6≤ML<1.4矿震作为加卸载响应震级的随机性较大,分析是两种不同机制矿震混合的结果,不适宜作为加卸载响应震级;开采深度越大,地应力环境强度越高,预测敏感性和效果越好.在阜新煤田和门头沟矿田进行普适性检验,预测信度分别为0.8和0.73.试验结果表明,加卸载响应比理论和方法预测强矿震具有较好的效能和应用前景. Taking Laohutai Coal Mine in Fushun of northeastern China as an engineering background,an application study of strong mining-induced seismicity prediction was carried out on the basis of the load/unload response ratio(LURR) theory.It is shown that when the load/unload response magnitude adopts the mining-induced seismicity of 0≤ML≤0.5,the forecasting efficacy is very good in all mining depths and the average forecasting reliability of the staged peak magnitude is 0.72.When ML≥1.4,the response magnitude is direct proportion to mining depth,and is generally 0.5 to 1.0 lower than the predicted magnitude,while the average forecasting reliability of the staged peak magnitude is 0.60.When 0.6≤ML1.4,there might be a mixture of two mining-induced seismicities with different mechanisms,which is not suitable to the load/unload response magnitude due to its wide randomness.With the increase of mining depth,the in-situ stress intensity is higher,and the prediction is better.According to universal tests in Fuxin Coal Field and Mentougou Mine,the forecasting reliability is 0.8 and 0.73,respectively.The results indicate that the LURR theory and methods have a good ability and a broad application in predicting strong mining-induced seismicity.
出处 《北京科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1307-1311,共5页 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing
基金 国家高技术发展研究计划资助项目(2008AA062104)
关键词 深部开采 矿震 震级 预测 deep mining mining-induced seismicity magnitude prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kijko A, Drzela B, Stankiewicz, T. Bimodal character of the distribution of extreme seismic events in Polish mines. Acta Geophys Pol, 1988, 35(2) : 157.
  • 2Johnston J C, Einstein M H. A survey of mining associated seismicity// Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium. Minneapolis, 1990:121.
  • 3Knoll P, Kuhnt W. Investigation of the mechanism of rockbursts by seismological measurements//Rockbursts, Global Experiences, International Bureau of Strata Mechanics. Hyderabad, 1990 : 11.
  • 4Gaviglio P, Revalor R, Piguet J P, et al. Tectonic structures,strata properties and rockbursts occurrence in French coal mine // Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: Proceedings of the 2nd Interna- tional Symposium. Minneapolis, 1990 : 289.
  • 5Krishnamurthy R, Shringarputale S B. Rockburst hazard in Kolar Gold Fields//Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium. Minneapolis, 1990:411.
  • 6李铁,蔡美峰,蔡明.采矿诱发地震分类的探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(z2):3679-3686. 被引量:26
  • 7尹祥础,陈学忠,宋治平,尹灿.加卸载响应比──一种新的地震预报方法[J].地球物理学报,1994,37(6):767-775. 被引量:102
  • 8尹祥础,陈学忠,宋治平.加卸载响应比理论及其在地震预测中的应用研究进展[J].地球物理学报,1994,37(A01):223-230. 被引量:17
  • 9尹祥础.地震预报的新途径——加卸载响应比理论[J].力学与实践,2004,26(6):1-7. 被引量:28
  • 10Li T, Chert S H. The mechanism of the self-similarlty of the Gutenburg-Richter relation: a km-scale in-situ observational investigation//RaSiM7 ( 2009 ) : Sustainable Development of Deep Controlling Seismic Hazard and Mines. Dalian, 2009 : 1003.

二级参考文献45

  • 1陈建民,杨林章,张昭栋,石荣会,张继红.地下水位固体潮响应的地震异常[J].地震,1994,14(1):73-78. 被引量:14
  • 2陈学忠,尹祥础.水库地震主震前加卸载响应比的变化特征[J].中国地震,1995,11(4):361-367. 被引量:13
  • 3许强,黄润秋.用加卸载响应比理论探讨斜坡失稳前兆[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1995,6(2):25-30. 被引量:30
  • 4尹祥础,陈学忠,宋治平,王裕仓.关东等地区加卸载响应比的时间变化及其预测意义[J].中国地震,1996,12(3):331-334. 被引量:18
  • 5[2]Kijko A,Drzezla B,Stankiewicz T.Bimodal character of the distribution of extreme seismic events in Polish mines[J].Acta Geophys.Pol.,1987,35:157-166.
  • 6[3]Johnston J C,Einstein M H.A survey of mining associated seismicity[A].In:Proc.the 2nd Int.Symp.Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines[C].Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1990.121-127.
  • 7[4]Knoll P,Kuhnt W.Investigation of the mechanism of rockbursts by seismological measurements[A].In:Rockbursts,Global Experiences,International Bureau of Strata Mechanics[C].Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1990.11-36.
  • 8[5]Gaviglio P,Revalor R,Piguet J P,et al.Tectonic structures,strata properties and rockbursts occurrence in French coal mine[A].In:Proc.the 2nd Int.Symp.Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines[C].Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1990.289-293.
  • 9[6]Krishnamurthy R,Shringarputale S B.Rockburst hazard in Kolar Gold Fields[A].In:Proc.the 2nd Int.Symp.Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines[C].Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1990.411-420.
  • 10[7]Wong I G.Recent developments in rockbursts and mine seismicity research[A].In:Proc.the 33rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics[C].Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1992.1 103-1 112.

共引文献156

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部