期刊文献+

美国学习不良概念的发展、问题及对策 被引量:1

The Notion of Learning Disability in America:The Developments,Problems and Solutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学习不良概念自提出后一直存在争议。学习不良的正式定义和操作定义都存在一些问题。正式定义处于规定定义的发展水平,缺乏科学定义的两个关键元素——理解性和解释性。操作定义缺乏与正式定义的逻辑联系,变异性太大,在实际使用中也存在一些问题。针对学习不良的定义问题,研究者提出了不同的解决方法。 The notion of learning disability has been a long-standing source of controversy after its emergence. There are some problems in formal and operational definition. The formal definition is a stipulative definition,and it lacks two critical scientific elements,namely understanding and explanation. The operational definition does not possess a logical and rational relationship to dements stipulated in the formal definition. Moreover,the variability in identification is considerable. There are also some difficulties in the practice of using operational definition. Researchers have proposed different methods to solve the definition problem.
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期52-56,共5页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 江西省"十二五"教育科学规划重点课题<学习不良儿童鉴定的理论与实践研究>(项目编号:200800277)
关键词 学习不良 正式定义 操作定义 鉴定 learning disability formal definition operational definition identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1朱会田,杜愎刚,廖祥兵,王建兵.汽油机TWC系统早期失效原因及对策[J].小型内燃机与摩托车,2002,31(3):40-43. 被引量:4
  • 2张雅明,俞国良.美国学习不良的概念及发展[J].中国特殊教育,2003(5):51-55. 被引量:11
  • 3Kavale,K. A.,Spaulding,L S.,Beam,A P.. A time to define: making the specific learning disability defmition prescribe specific learning disability[J]. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 2009,32: 39-48.
  • 4Kavale,K. A.,Fomess,$. R.. What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis [ J ]. Journal of Learning Disabilities,2000,33: 239-256.
  • 5Bateman,B.. An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders [A]. Hellmuth,J. (Ed.). Learning disorders [C ]. Seattle,WA: Special Child Publica -fions,1965. 219-239.
  • 6张小将,刘昌,刘迎杰.学习不良鉴定的能力-成绩差异模型[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):229-234. 被引量:14
  • 7Marianne S. M.. The ability-Achievement discrep- ancy: does it contribute to an understanding of learning dis- abilities? [J]. Educational Psychology Review,2000,12(3): 315-337.
  • 8HeUer K. A., Holtzman W. H., Messick S.. Placing children in special education: a strategy for equity [M]. Washington :National Academy Press, 1982. 153-165.
  • 9Fuchs L,& Fuchs D.. Use of curriculum-based measurement in identifying students with dlsabilitles[J]. Fo- cus on Exceptional Children, 1997,30:1-16.
  • 10Bergmann,G.. Sense and nonsense in opera- tion[A]. P. G. Frank (Ed.). The validation of scientific theo- ries [C]. New York: Collier, 1961.45-56.

二级参考文献59

  • 1辛自强,俞国良.学习不良的界定与操作化定义[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):52-57. 被引量:73
  • 2俞国良.学习不良儿童的评价[J].心理发展与教育,1995,11(1):48-52. 被引量:7
  • 3辛自强,俞国良.学习不良儿童研究的社会认知取向[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):544-548. 被引量:23
  • 4张小将,刘昌,刘迎杰.学习不良鉴定的能力-成绩差异模型[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):229-234. 被引量:14
  • 5Eileen M A.Specific learning disability:current approaches to identification and proposals for change.Project Forum at National Association of State Directors of Special Education,Virginia,2003
  • 6Ackerman P,Peter J,Dykman P.Children with learning disabilities:WISC profiles.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1971,4:150~166
  • 7Kavale K A,Forness S R.A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorixations:Patterns or parodies? Learning Disability Quarterly,1984,7:136~156
  • 8Bateman D W.An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disabilities.In:J Hellmuth.Learning disorders.Seattle:Special Child Publication,1965.219~239
  • 9Mercer C D,Jordan L,Allsop D H et al.Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1996,19:217~232
  • 10Cone T,Wilson L.Quantifying a sever discrepancy.A critical analysis.Learning Disability Quarterly,1981,4:359~372

共引文献31

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部