鲁迅的浙东脾气

郜元宝认为,今天仍然弥漫着鲁迅与之搏斗的各种"文字游戏";只有在"文字游戏"停止的地方,我们才可能与鲁迅真实相遇,才会发现,原来他是怎样的无法绕过。孙郁认为,浙东文化对鲁迅早期思想和精神底色有多方面的辐射,而鲁迅的现代眼光则颠覆了这一传统并赋予浙东文化另一种隐含。刘绪源认为,《两地书》是仅次于《野草》的、最能反映本真的鲁迅的书,那种把对虚无与黑暗的反抗作为生命本体的实践,和"察见渊鱼者不祥"的自省,是理解鲁迅的一把重要钥匙。袁盛勇认为,鲁迅思想及其话语实践中的正面和负面因素是难以分割地联系在一起的,应采取一种辩证的态度,回到一个复杂而完整的鲁迅那里。张钊贻则认为,鲁迅早期"反民主"言论有其历史原因,并非反对民主的理念,他对目前的民主制度能否真正实现确有怀疑,根源在于两种现代性的矛盾理念。

Gao Yuanbao holds that today there still prevails various 'language game' against which Lu Xun had fought.We could only meet with Lu Xun at where the 'language game' stopped,and to find he is inevitably there.Sun Yu believes that Lu Xun’s perspective covers the cultural tradition of East Zhejiang Province which had influenced his early ideas.Liu Xuyuan takes that Lu Xun’s Letters Between Two Places can best reflect his true self,which is a praxis of ontological life as a resistance against nothingness and darkness.Yuan Shengyong believes that there are positive and negative sides in Lu Xun’s thought and discourse,and a dialectical attitude should be taken for returning to a complicated and wholesome Lu Xun.Zhang Zhaoyi holds that Lu Xun’s early 'anti-democratic' sayings has its historical reason.He is not against the idea od democracy.The source of contradictory ideas of modernity made him doubt if there could really be a democratic system.