期刊文献+

高校学生评教工具的结构与维度 被引量:3

Structures and Dimensions of College Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校教学管理部门自制的评教问卷目前仍是被广泛使用的学生评教工具,这些问卷的结构往往缺少足够的科学性和有效性。通过对已有研究成果的分析和思考,发现学生评教普遍被认为具有多维结构,且在多个维度之上存在"总教学效果"的二阶因素。国外编制的学生评教工具更关注教学行为本身,主要从演讲者、推动者和管理者三种角色定义教师有效教学的维度。而在传统教育思想的影响下,我国学生评教的维度中还更加注意考察教师的道德和敬业精神等维度。 The teaching evaluation questionnaires,which are self-made by the teaching management departments,are widely used in universities.Their structures are not made based on science and validity.Some researches show that student evaluations of teaching effectiveness has a multi-dimensional structure and a second-order factor called 'general teaching effectiveness' over the dimensions.In the foreign multidimensional student rating forms,teaching is usually evaluated in terms of three roles: presenter,facilitator,and manager.However,the instruction behavior is the core of the evaluation.On the opposite,morality and professional ethics are added in Chinese student rating tools as two important concerns.
出处 《高教发展与评估》 CSSCI 2011年第6期33-38,134,共6页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 学生评教 教学质量评价 教学效果评估 students' evaluation on teaching teaching quality evaluation teaching performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Marsh H W, Roche L A. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, 52(11).
  • 2d'Apollonia S, Abrami P C. Navigating student ratings of instruction[J]. American Psycholo- gist, 52(11).
  • 3McKeachie W J. Student ratings: the validity of use[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, 52 (11).
  • 4Aleamoni L. Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998[J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1999, 13(2): 153-166.
  • 5Feldman K A. Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they re- ceive from students[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1983, 18(1): 3-14.
  • 6Marsh H W, Muth6n B, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2009, 16(3).
  • 7Linn R L, Centra J A, Tucker L. Between, within, and total group factor analysis of student ratings of instruetion[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975, 10(3): 277-288.
  • 8McKeachie W J, I.in Y-G, Mann W. Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: validity stud ies[J].American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8(3) : 435-445.
  • 9Kolitch E, Dean A V. Student rating of instruction in USA: hidden assumption and missing conceptions about good's teaching[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1999, 24(1): 27-42.
  • 10刘洁,李蔚,段远源.美国大学学生评教工作及其启示——以伊利诺伊大学香槟分校为例[J].中国大学教学,2007(8):87-89. 被引量:41

二级参考文献27

  • 1张春兴.教育心理学 重订版[M].台北:东华书局股份有限公司,2000,3.173—287.
  • 2赵增梅 孟庆茂.大学生评价教师教学效果二阶维度分析.新世纪心理与教育测量展望[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.253—267.
  • 3Cai Y H. The Status and Reflection of Teacher Performance Appraisal Research. Higher Teacher Education Research. 2001, (3) :73 ~ 76.
  • 4Cai Y H, Lin C D. The Status and Reflection of Performance Appraisal Research. The Transaction of Beijing Nomad University( Social Science Edition). 2001, (4) : 119 ~ 126.
  • 5Borman W C, Motowidlo S J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: N Schmitt, W C Borman ed. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1993. 71 ~98.
  • 6Feldman K A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external(neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education. 1989,30:137 ~ 194.
  • 7Marsh H W, Roche L A. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students" evaluations of teaching: popular myth, bias,validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology,2002, 92 ( 1 ) : 202 ~ 208.
  • 8Marsh H W, Dunkin M J. Students'evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In: Smart J ed. Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon,1992.
  • 9Campbell J P. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: M D Dunnette, L MHough ed. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology,2nd. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990. 687 ~ 732.
  • 10Cai Y H. Teacher' s Job Performance: the Construction and Influence Factors Research. Doctor Degree Dissertation of Beijing Normal University. 2002.

共引文献229

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部