广义物概念的法典化

Codification of the Generalized"Res"

《物权法》对物下的定义过于简单,与我国社会生活实践严重脱节,在未来《民法典》中有必要对物的概念重新定义。目前,我国已有的几个物权法的专家建议稿与《物权法》相比,在立法技术和涵盖范围方面均有不同,有些方面值得未来立法借鉴。物的概念关系整个财产法的立法基础,需要单设条文详细规定。条文的设置,宜采用一般性规定+特别规定的模式,对物下个较为全面的名至实归的定义。

The definition of ＂res＂ in the Real Right Law of the People＇s Republic of China （hereinafter as ＂real right law＂） is too simple, and lagged far behind China＇s social life. Therefore, we should redefine the term ＂res＂ in ＂Civil Code＂ in the future. Comparing several experts＇ proposals of the real right legislation and the ＂real right law＂, we can find there are some differences in the legislative technique and the law＇s coverage. The concept of ＂res＂ is concerned with legislative basis of the property law, and need to be defined in a special provision. This provision should adopt the model of ＂general rules＂ plus ＂special rules＂ and give ＂res＂ a comprehensive and really well-deserved definition.