期刊文献+

英语主语和宾语关系从句加工差异的主要理论概述

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前对于英语关系从句的研究主要集中在这两种结构加工差异和形成加工差异的成因上。不同的心理语言学家提出了不同的理论来解释这种差异。鉴于之前相关的文献比较分散和简略,文章旨在于对各个理论进行一个比较详细的回顾,使人们进一步了解英语关系从句这种特殊,复杂的加工过程。
作者 兰丽珍
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第6期113-115,共3页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张强,杨亦鸣.汉语宾语关系从句加工优势——来自神经电生理学研究的证据[J].语言科学,2010,9(4):337-353. 被引量:36
  • 2Clifton,C.,Frazier.L.Comprehending sentences withlong-distance dependencies. Linguistic structure inlanguage processing . 1989
  • 3Hsiao,F,Gibson.E.Processing relative clauses inChinese. Cognition . 2003
  • 4Traxler,M.J,,Morris,R.K,,Seely.E.R.ProcessingSubject and Object Relative Clauses:Evidence from EyeMovements. Journal of Memory and Language . 2002
  • 5Keenan E,Comrie B.Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry . 1977
  • 6Sheldon,A.On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses. English Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal be-haviour . 1974
  • 7MacDonald,Maryellen C,Morten H.Christiansen.Reassessing working memory:Acomment on Just and Car-penter(1992)and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review . 2002
  • 8MacWhinney,B,Plh,C.The Processing of Restrictive Relative Clauses in Hungarian. Cognition . 1988
  • 9Gibson,E.The dependency locality theory:A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image,Language,Brain . 2000
  • 10Gibson E.Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition . 1998

二级参考文献43

  • 1杨亦鸣.语言的理论假设与神经基础——以当前汉语的若干神经语言学研究为例[J].语言科学,2007,6(2):60-83. 被引量:30
  • 2周统权.2009.《主/宾语提取的汉语关系从句加工研究》,北京师范大学博士后出站报告.
  • 3Law,S.-P.,and Leung,M.-T.1998 Sentence comprehension in Cantonese Chinese aphasic patients.Aphasiology,12,49-63.
  • 4Lin,C.-J.,and Bever,T.2006 Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese.In Baumer,D.,Montero,D.,and Scanlon,M.(eds.),Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics.254-260.Somerville,MA:Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  • 5MacDonald,M.C.1994 Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution.Language and Cognitive Processes,9,157-201.
  • 6MacDonald,M.C.,and Christiansen,M.2002 Reassessing working memory:Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).Psychological Review,109,35-54.
  • 7MacWhinney,B.,and Pleh,C.1988 The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian.Cognition,29,95-141.
  • 8Mak,W.M.,Vonk,W.,and Schriefers,H.2002 The influence of animacy on relative clause processing.Journal of Memory and Language,47,50-68.
  • 9Mak,W.M.,Vonk,W.,and Schriefers,H.2006 Animacy in processing relative clause:The hikers that rocks crush.Journal of Memory and Language,54,466-490.
  • 10Mecklinger,A.,Schriefers,H.,Steinhauer,K.,and Friederici,A.D.1995 Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions:An analysis with Event-Related Potentials.Memory and Cognition,23,477-494.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部