期刊文献+

腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的临床应用 被引量:20

腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的临床应用
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种麻醉方法在剖宫产手术中的临床应用效果。方法 2009年10月~2010年12月,选取行剖宫产手术的孕妇62例,随机分成两组,分别行腰硬联合麻醉和单纯硬膜外麻醉,对两种麻醉方法的起效时间和麻醉效果等指标进行统计学分析。结果腰硬联合麻醉组与单纯硬膜外麻醉组比较,麻醉起效时间明显缩短,局麻药用药量明显减少(P<0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉起效时间短、麻醉效果确切、用药量少,可为产妇实施剖宫产手术提供快速满意的麻醉效果,是一种值得信赖的麻醉方法。 Objective To compare two anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the clinical application of results.Methods In October 2009-2010 December,we selected 62 cases of pregnant women in our hospital with cesarean delivery,and randomly divided into two groups,lumbar epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia,since the two anesthetic methods onset time and anesthesia were measured and analyzed statistically.Results Lumbar epidural anesthesia group and epidural anesthesia group,anesthesia was significantly shorter onset time,significantly reduced the amount of local anesthetic agents(P0.05).Conclusion The onset of lumbar epidural anesthesia time is short,less medication,the implementation of cesarean section for maternal satisfaction with the anesthetic to provide rapid results,is a reliable method of anesthesia.
作者 谢鹰
出处 《当代医学》 2011年第33期110-111,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 剖宫产手术 临床效果 Lumbar epidural anesthesia Cesarean section surgery Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1裴焕爽,李力兵,邢玉英,王树青,裴进宽,王士杰.开胸手术病人不同浓度罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞联合靶控输注异丙酚麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(5):477-479. 被引量:1
  • 2刘祥平,刘怀清,卢建明,杨兵,闵苏.全麻联合硬膜外麻醉下胆道手术患者上腹部肌松程度与肌松监测水平的关系[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(6):569-570. 被引量:4
  • 3陈伯銮.局部麻醉药.见:刘俊杰,赵俊,主编.现代麻醉学.第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.297-313.
  • 4Lacassie HJ,Columb MO,Lacassie HP,et al. The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor. Anesth Analg, 2002,95: 204-208.
  • 5Eledjam JJ,Ripart J,Viel E. Clinical application of ropivacaine for the lower extremity. Curr Top Med Chem,2001,1 : 227-331.
  • 6Kampe S,Tausch B, Paul M,et al. Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being. Curr Med Res Opin,2004,20:7-12.
  • 7Crosby E, Sandler A, Finucane B, et al. Comparison of epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0. 5% for caesarean section. Can J Anaesth, 1998,45:1066-1071.
  • 8McClellan K J, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs,2000,60:1065-1093.
  • 9Tuttle AA, Katz JA, Bridenbaugh PO, et al. A doubleblind comparison of the abdominal wall relaxation produced by epidural 0.75%ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine in gynecologic surgery. Reg Anesth, 1995,20: 515-520.
  • 10苏冬梅,隋波,孙潮涌,汪忠镐.胃食管反流病人微量射频治疗时咪达唑仑-异丙酚-芬太尼的麻醉效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(9):850-851. 被引量:9

共引文献49

同被引文献95

引证文献20

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部