期刊文献+

鼻咽癌的放化疗现状 被引量:1

Concurrent status of chemotherapy and radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 调强放疗(IMRT)在剂量学和放射生物效应方面较传统放疗技术具有优势,已成为鼻咽癌放疗的主流。中晚期鼻咽癌单纯放疗的疗效较差,放化疗综合治疗可显著提高疗效。目前同步放化疗逐渐成为局部晚期鼻咽癌的标准治疗模式,但诱导化疗和辅助化疗的价值及其与同步放化疗之间的不同组合模式有待明确。 Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)is a more advanced radiotherapy technique than routine radiotherapy, and has been effectively utilized in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Rradiotherapy alone has disappointing effect to local advanced cases. Nevertheless, chemoradiotherapy provides long term survival. Chemoradiotherapy is becoming the standard therapeutic regimen for local advanced NPC. But different ways of chemomdiotherapy such as induction, concurrent, adjuvant chemotherapy still need to be defined.
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2011年第11期839-842,共4页 Journal of International Oncology
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 放射疗法 药物疗法 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Radiotherapy Drug therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Alektiar KM, Brennan MF, Healey JH, et al. Impact of intensitymod- ulated radiation therapy on local control in primary soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(20) :3440-3444.
  • 2Graft P, Lapeyre M, Desandes E, et al. Impact of intensitymodulated radiotherapy on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients : matched-pair comparison with conventional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 67(5) :1309-1317.
  • 3Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, et al. Volumetric intensity- modulated arc therapy VS conventional IMRT in head-and-neck canc- er: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radit Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 74( 1 ) :252-259.
  • 4Liang SB, Sun Y, Liu LZ, et al. Extension of local disease in naso- pharyngeal carcinoma detected by magnetic resonance imaging: improvement of clinical target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Bid Phys, 2009, 75(3) :742-750.
  • 5Sohn M J, Lee DJ,Yoon SW, et al. The effective application segmen- tal image in spinal radiosurgery improved targeting of spjnal tumors. Acta Neurochir(wien), 2009, 151 (3) :231-238.
  • 6Venkitaraman R, Ramanan SG, Vasanthan A, et al. Results of eoml- bined modality treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer. J Cancer Res Ther, 2009, 5(2):102-106.
  • 7Chua DT, Ma J, Sham JS, et al. Improvement of survival after additionof induction chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of two Phase Ⅲtrials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65(5) :1300-1306.
  • 8Hui EP, Ma BB, Leung SF, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲtrial of con- current cisplatin-radiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(2) :242-249.
  • 9Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR, et al. Cisplatin and fluorou- racil 'alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(17) :1705-1715.
  • 10Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J. Radiotherapy plus cetuxirnab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer:5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximub- inducedrash and survival Lancet OncoI, 2010, 11 ( 1 ) :21-28.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部