期刊文献+

国际投资条约自由化背景下防御性条款的设置——对我国BITs实践的思考 被引量:2

Establishment of Defensive Regulations in International Investment Treaties from Liberalization Perspectives——Pondering over BITs Practice in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在国际投资条约自由化的趋势下,一些发展中国家相继接受了ICSID的全面管辖权、宽泛的间接征收定义等自由化条款,给国家的外资管辖权带来挑战。为此,应采取例外规定、限制间接征收等防御性条款,以保障国家基于环境、国家安全等政策的需要对外资实施必要的管制措施。自1998年以来,我国投资条约的内容日趋自由化,研究在BIT中采取适当的防御性规定、避免类似阿根廷不慎放权的教训,是当前我国BITs实践的迫切需要。 Following the trend to liberalization of international investment treaties, some developing countries have successively adopted such liberalized regulations as the complete jurisdiction and extensive indirect expropriation in ICSID, which results in the challenge to the state’s jurisdiction over foreign capital. Therefore, defensive provisions as exceptions and limitations on indirect expropriation should be regulated to guarantee the state to exercise necessary control on foreign capital for purposes of environment and state security policies. Our state’s investment treaties have been increasingly liberalized since 1998, thus, driven by BIT practice, it is urgent to research on proper adoption of defensive regulations in BIT so as to avoid the failure of incautious discharge of control in some states as Argentina.
作者 余莹
出处 《北方法学》 2008年第3期104-111,共8页 Northern Legal Science
关键词 间接征收 投资自由化 外资管制措施 indirect expropriation investment liberalization regulatory measures on foreign capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献14

  • 1See Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. The Government of Canada, http://wol, international, gc. ca/minpub/Publication, asp? publication_id=37831 &Language= E.
  • 2See S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, 40 I. L.M. 1408, 1437 (NAFTA Arb. Trib. Nov. 13, 2000).
  • 3See Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, 40 I. L. M. 36 (2001).
  • 4See NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions 2 (2001) clarifying that article 1105 embodies the customary international law standard for determining possible violations of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security", see httpt//WWW, naftaclaims, com/Papers/July%2031%202001%20NAFTA%20FTC%20Statement. pdf.
  • 5See David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States - Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 679, 715 (2004).
  • 6A. Roth,The Minium Standard of International Law Applied to Aliens(1949),p. 99.
  • 7See R. Lillich, Duties of States Regarding Civil Rights of Aliens, Recueil des Cours (1978) ,p. 350.
  • 8See J. H. W. Verzvjl, International Law in Historical Perspective(1972) ,p. 438.
  • 9See Mondev v. United States, 42 I. L. M. 85 (2003).
  • 10See ADF Group, Inc. v. United States, paras. 44-45 (ICSID Jan. 9,2003), http://WWW, worldbank, org/iesid/eases/ADF-a-ward. pdf.

共引文献52

同被引文献19

  • 1Been,V. and Beauvais,J.C., The global fifthamendment. NAFTA ’ s investment international regula-tory takings doctrine. New York University Law Review,Vol/78,No.30,2003.
  • 2Caroline,H.,Indirect expropriation and theright to regulate: Revisiting proportionality analysis andthe standard of review in investor-state arbitration. Jour-nal Of International Economic Law, Vol. 15, No.l, 2012.
  • 3Gibson, C., A look at the compulsory license ininvestment arbitration: The case of indirect expropria-tion. American University International Law Review,Vol.25,No.3,2010.
  • 4.Gutbrod,M. and Hindelang,S., Extemalizationof effective legal protection against indirect expropria-tion. Journal Of World Investment And Trade,Vol.7,No.6,2006.
  • 5Isakoff,P.D.,Defining the scope of indirect ex-propriation for international investments. Global Busi-ness Law Review,Vol.3,No.2,2013.
  • 6Kriebaum,U.,Regulatory takings : Balancingthe interests of the investor and the state. Journal OfWorld Investment And Trade, Vol.8,No.5,2007.
  • 7Ripinsky,S.,Assessing damages in investmentdisputes : Practice in search of perfect. Journal OfWorld Investment And Trade,Vol.10,No.1,2009.
  • 8Paulsson,J.,Denial of justice in internationallaw. American Journal Of International Law, Vol.100,No.2,2006.
  • 9石慧.中国对外签订新式双边投资条约需要注意的问题[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2008,33(2):27-31. 被引量:4
  • 10张辉.美国国际投资法理论和实践的晚近发展——浅析美国双边投资条约2004年范本[J].法学评论,2009,27(2):63-68. 被引量:17

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部