4See Frye v. United States,293 F. 1013(D. C. Cir. 1923).
5See Paul C Giannelli,The Admissibility of novel scientific evidence:Frye v. United States,a half- century later, 80 Colum.L Rev(1980).
6See Shauna Flenming Askim,United States v.Scheffer:An mxxnaly in the miltabyor a return to the per se ban of polygraph evidence,37 Hous. L Rev. 175(spring,2000).
7See Edward J Imwinkelried,The Daubert decision on the admissibility of science evidence: The supreme cour-choose the right piece for all the evidentiary puzzles,9 St. John's J Legal Comment. 5,22(1993).
8See John C Candam,Jr ,Military Rule of Evidence 707:A Bright line rule that needs to be dimmed, 140 MIL L REV.65,69(1993).
9See United States v. Seheffer,523 U S 303(1998).
10See Andrew R Stolfi,Why Illinois should abandon frye's general aeceptence standard for the admission of novel science evidence, 78 Off - Kent L Rev. 861 (2003).
