期刊文献+

论我国行政调解制度的价值优势 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 自美国掀起ADR热潮后,建立与完善多元化的行政纠纷解决机制,在行政过程中引入诉讼外调解已日渐成为人们所关注的话题。行政调解制度与公力救济、私力救济及其他行政性ADR相比较,有着其经济性、灵活性、效率性以及个案公正性等独特的价值优势,在我国有着深厚的发展基础及顽强的生命力,亟待建立适应于我国体制的诉讼外行政纠纷调解制度。
作者 张蕾
出处 《科教文汇》 2006年第8期106-107,共2页 Journal of Science and Education
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Betty South Murphy, ADR's Impact on International Commeroe, Dispute Resolution Journal,Dec. 1998 ,p.68.
  • 2Frand E.A. Sander ,Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview, University of Florida Law Review, Winter 1985 ,pp. 94-100.
  • 3Mauro Cappelletti, Alternative Dispute Resolutions Within the Framework of the World - Wide Acoess - to - Justice Movement, The Modem Law Review, Vol. 56,1993,pp. 282 - 287.
  • 4Christine Dver Ploug, ADR(中译文)[J].河北法学,1998,:58-59.
  • 5Tom Arnold,A Vocabulary of ADR Procedures, Dispute Resolution Journal,Oct-Dec. 1995, p.69.
  • 6Jacqueline M. Nolan - Habey,Alternative Dispute Resolution in Nutshell, West Pub. Co, 1992,p.5.
  • 7William Twining, Alternative to What? Theories of Litigation procedure and Dispute Settlement in Anglo American Jurisprudence: Some Neglected Classics, the Modern Law Review, vol. 56, 1993, p. 380.
  • 8R. Abel,The politics of Informal Justice,from L. L. Riskin & J. E. Westbrook, Dispute Resolutions and Lawyers,West Pub.Co. 1987,p.421.
  • 9L. L. Riskin & J. E. Westbrook ,Disoute Resolutions and Lawyers, West Pub. Co. 1987, p. 11.
  • 10Jacquedline M. Nolan - Haley, Alterrtative Dispute Resolution in Nutshell, West Pub. Co. 1992,pp. 123-125.

共引文献54

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部