摘要
本文根据现行有关教育的法律、法规和规章,从法理角度区别高考和高招两种不同性质的法律关系,对天津市以地方规章的名义颁布了两个《裁决办法》,使两个裁决委员会的成立、裁决程序、裁决结果合法化,并对两个裁决办法的实施情况进行了总结。裁决委员会的相对独立和社会性以及裁决程序的公开、公正性,增强了解决2005年高考高招争议案件的社会公信度,取得了较好的社会效果。但这仅仅是初探,对这种裁决制度,还应该继续健全和完善,特别是在国家级的立法中,应做出明确的规定,以协调不同位阶法律规范性文件的统一性。
According to the current education law,statutes and rules,this article distinguishes the law relationship between college entrance examination and col- lege entrance enrollment.Under the name of district's rules,Tianjin issued two deciding measures,it made the foundation of deciding committee,the deciding procedure,and the deciding outcomes legality.The relatively independence and sociality of the deciding committee and the open equity deciding procedure strengthen the trusting in year 2005 college entrance examination and college entrance enrollment disputed case,it obtained a good social result.The deciding system is a preliminary study,it will be continued perfectible,especially for na- tional legislation,this system would make rules definitively,and correspond with the difference legal documents.
出处
《考试研究》
2006年第1期75-89,共15页
Examinations Research
关键词
高考高招
争议裁决
法制
初探
college entrance examination and college entrance enrollment
disputed deciding
legal system
Preliminary study