期刊文献+

Relation of loudness to loudness just noticeable difference of tone 被引量:4

Relation of loudness to loudness just noticeable difference of tone
原文传递
导出
摘要 A relation of loudness to loudness just noticeable difference (JND) is derived based on signal detection theory and the hypothesis that loudness is the nerve spike count in the duration of T, and the spike rate distribution of stable tonal stimulus is a stable normal stochastic process. The relation suggests that ratio of loudness JND to loudness of tone is independent of intensity, which can explain well experimental results about the relation of intensity JND to intensity of tone, especially those that could not be explained before such as the Weber fraction hump at the moderate level and the near miss to Weber's law. A relation of loudness to loudness just noticeable difference (JND) is derived based on signal detection theory and the hypothesis that loudness is the nerve spike count in the duration of T, and the spike rate distribution of stable tonal stimulus is a stable normal stochastic process. The relation suggests that ratio of loudness JND to loudness of tone is independent of intensity, which can explain well experimental results about the relation of intensity JND to intensity of tone, especially those that could not be explained before such as the Weber fraction hump at the moderate level and the near miss to Weber's law.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Acoustics》 2000年第3期240-246,共7页 声学学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Miller G A.Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking andloudness. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1947
  • 2Florentine M.Level discrimination of tones as a function of duation. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1986
  • 3Hellman W S,Hellman R P.Intensity discrimination as the driving force for loudness.Applicationto pure tones in quiet. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1990
  • 4He N J,Dubno J R,Mills J H.Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximumliklihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1998
  • 5Riesz R.The relationship between loudness and the minimum perceptible increment of intensity. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1933
  • 6Buns S,Florentine M,Poulsen T.Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, andthe form of the loudness function. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1997
  • 7Green D M,Mason C R.Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber’s law. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1985
  • 8Florentine M,Buns S,Mason C R.Level discrimination as a function of level for topes from0.25 kHz to 16 kHz. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1987
  • 9Oxenham A J.Temporal integration at 6 kHz as a function of rasher bandwidth. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1998
  • 10Relkin E M,Doucet J R.Neural contributions to the perstimulus compound action potential:implications for measuring the growth of the auditory nerve spike count as a function of stimilusintensity. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America . 1997

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部