期刊文献+

改进雷达图评价方法在汽车综合性能评价中的应用 被引量:8

Application of improved radar chart evaluation method on evaluation of automobile comprehensive performances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用雷达图综合评价方法对汽车综合性能进行了定性和定量评价分析。选择汽车动力性、经济性、安全性、操纵稳定性、舒适性等评价指标,建立了合理的性能指标评价体系。对4款轿车评价指标进行标准化处理,以消除量纲和量纲单位的影响。利用具有评价结果唯一性的改进雷达图综合评价方法对4款轿车的综合性能进行了评价,并利用层次分析法分析了各个性能的权重,使评价结果更具全面性和合理性。 The qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the automobile comprehensive performance were performed using the radar chart comprehensive evaluation method.The dynamic performance,the fuel economy,the driving safety,the handling stability and the ride comfort were chosen as the evaluation indexes,a reasonable evaluation system was established.The evaluation indexes of 4 automobiles were normalized to eliminate the impacts of their dimensions and dimensional units.The comprehensive performances of the 4 automobiles were evaluated using method of improved radar chart which is characterized by the result uniqueness.The weights of the evaluated performances were anlyzed by the analytic hierarchy process to make the evaluated results more comprehensive and reasonable.
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期1522-1526,共5页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50905017) 北京市科委研发攻关课题(D08010400250804) 电动车辆国家工程实验室开放基金项目(BIT-NELEV-2010-2)
关键词 车辆工程 汽车综合性能 雷达图 综合评价 层次分析法 vehicle engineering automobile comprehensive performance radar chart comprehensive evaluation analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1郑惠莉,刘陈,翟丹妮.基于雷达图的综合评价方法[J].南京邮电学院学报,2001,21(2):75-79. 被引量:94
  • 2Liu Yi-jing, Liu Ming. Evaluation of drawing abilitybased on radar chart[C]//ITCS '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, Washington D C, USA, 2009 : 574-576.
  • 3Liu Wen-yuan, Wang Bao-wen, Yu Jia-xin, et al. Visualization classification method of multi- dimen sional data based on radar chart mapping[C]//2008 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics ( ICMLC), Kunming, China, 2008, 7 : 857-862.
  • 4Banuelas R, Antony J. Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate uncertainty and managerial aspects[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2004,42(18) :3851-3872.
  • 5沈群,黄晓明,卞凤兰.基于层次分析法的收费公路债务风险评价[J].公路交通科技,2009,16(1):154-158. 被引量:7
  • 6孔繁森,王军,孙海港.基于层次分析法的发动机缸体生产线设备可用性的模糊综合评价[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2008,38(6):1332-1336. 被引量:10
  • 7Berrittella M, Franca L L, Zito P. An analytic hierarchy process for ranking operating costs of low cost and full service airtines[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2009,15 (5) : 249-255.
  • 8Elif D K, Zulal G. The usability analysis with heuristic evaluation and analytic hierarchy process [J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2009,39 (6) : 934-939.
  • 9张永锋,骆清国.装甲车辆柴油机整机性能的综合评价[J].机械工程学报,2006,42(B05):205-208. 被引量:7

二级参考文献18

共引文献114

同被引文献100

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部