期刊文献+

FEC和ARQ技术在可靠点—多点传输中的传输代价分析和比较 被引量:1

Transmission Cost Analysis and Comparison of FEC and ARQ Techniques in Reliable Multicast Transmission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于自动重复请求(ARQ)用于点—多点传输面临可伸缩性差的问题,因而前向纠错(FEC)技术近来得到重视。本文推导了在给定多点转发树拓扑结构和链路丢失率条件下计算端一端FEC机制传输代价的方法,进行了分析和模拟。研究表明:对可靠点—多点传输,FEC与重传相比会大大降低带宽需求,并且它们的性能差距随接收方数目的增加而扩大,即FEC具有更好的可伸缩性,适于大规模组通信应用。 Because Automatic Repeat reQuest(ARQ)techniques do not scale well to multicast pro tocols with large number of receivers,Forward Error Correction(FEC)techniques were payed at tention to recently. However, there was little study on the performance analysis and comparison of these two techniques in reliable multicast transmission. This paper gives a analysis method to com pute the transmission cost of the two techniques, given arbitrary multicast tree topology and link loss probability. We studied the performance using analysis and simulations. This research shows that for reliable multicast, comparied with retransmission, FEC techniques greatly reduce band width requirements. Further more, the performance gap enlarges as the number of receivers in creases which means FEC techniques have better scalability and are suitable for large multicast group.
出处 《通信学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 1999年第S1期363-367,共5页 Journal on Communications
关键词 可靠点—多点传输 差错控制 FEC 可伸缩性 reliable multicast,error control,FEC,scalability
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1赵东升,卢锡城,周兴铭.基于集成FEC的可靠多目广播及性能评价[J].计算机学报,1998,21(4):324-332. 被引量:2
  • 2Floyd S,Jacobson V.liu C G,et al.A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing. IEEE ACM Transactions on Networking . 1997
  • 3Paul S,Sabnani K,Lin J C,Bhattacharyya S.Reliable multicast Protocol(RMTP). IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications . 1997
  • 4Rizzo L.Effective erasure codes for reliable computer communication protocols. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review . 1997
  • 5Ballardie T,Francis P,Crowcroft J.Core based trees--an architecture for scalable inter-domain multicast routing. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review . 1993
  • 6Pingali S.Towsley D,Kurose J F.A comparision of sender-initiated and receiver-initiated reliable multicast protocols. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications . 1997
  • 7Bhagwat P,Mishra P P,Tripathi S K.Effect of topology on performance of reliable multicast communication.In:Proc of IEEE INFOCOM‘94,Toronto. Canada Reports . 1994

二级参考文献1

  • 1Han T,Proc IEEE ICC’95, Seattle Washington,1995年,221页

共引文献1

同被引文献11

  • 1STRAYER W, DEMPSEY B, WEAVER A. XTP-the Xpress Transfer Protocol[M]. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.
  • 2FLOYD S, JACOBSON V, LILT C, et al. A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing[J]. IEEE/ ACM ToN, 1997, 5(6):784-803.
  • 3PAUL S, SABNANI K. Reliable multicast transport protocol (RMTP)[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communication, Special Issue on Network Support for Multipoint Communications, 1997, 15(3):407-421.
  • 4CHOURISHI D, SESHADRI S, CHOURISHI D. Dynamic hybrid active reliable multicast (DHARM)[A]. ICC SIT'09[C]. Dresden, Germany, 2009. 629-634.
  • 5KOUTSONIKOLAS D, HU Y, WANG C. Pacifier: high-throughput, reliable multicast without crying babies in wireless mesh networks[A]. INFOCOM'09[C]. Brazil, 2009. 2473-2481.
  • 6SRINIVAS V, LU R. An efficient reliable multicast protocol for 802.11- based wiretess LANs[A]. WowMom'09[C]. Kos, Greece, 2009. 1-6.
  • 7ZHAN C, XU Y, WANG J, et al.Reliable multicast in wireless networks using network coding[A]. MASS'09[C]. Macao SAR, China, 2009. 506-515.
  • 8PAN Y, WANG H, LI G, et al. An analysis of the main factors on the performance of reliable multicast[A], ICME'02[C]. 2002. 25-28.
  • 9VUKOBRATOVIC D, DESPOTOVIC M. On the packet lengths of rateless codes[A], EUROCON'05[C]. Belgrade, Serbia, 2005.672-675.
  • 10LUBY M. LT codes[A]. FOCS'02[C]. Vancouver, Canada, 2002. 271-280.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部