期刊文献+

水稻细条病与白叶枯病菌间互作 被引量:3

Interaction between the strains of bacterial leaf stripe and bacterial leaf blight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨两病菌间相互作用对两病发生、严重度的影响 ,用平板双层交叉培养法测定 86株水稻细条病菌与 2 4株白叶枯病菌间的相互抑制作用。测定结果表明 ,两病菌间存在着 4种作用类型 , .两菌交互抑制 ; .细条病菌抑制白叶枯病菌 ; .白叶枯病菌抑制细条病菌 ; .白叶枯病菌与细条病菌无交互抑制作用。细条病菌在 、 、 类型中的比例 (占供试菌株 ,下同 )分别为 4 .65%、 13.95%和 81.4 0 % ;白叶枯病菌在 、 、 类型中的比例分别为 12 .5%、 8.33%和 79.17%。选各类型代表菌株用针刺加喷雾法 ,分别混合接种稻叶进行相互作用试验结果 ,两病菌在同一叶片上均有其对应的典型病理症状。在 、 、 、 类型中 ,混接的细条病病指比单接病指分别相差 - 2 .0 7、2 .4 0、 - 2 .52、- 0 .2 4 ;混接的白叶枯病病指比单接病指分别相差 - 0 .89、- 6.4 2、 - 0 .18、 3.18。研究结果表明 ,被抑制菌株其混接发病严重度均轻于单接 ; The cultural method with double layer intersect plate was used for determining mutual inhibition among 86 strains of bacterial leaf stripe and 24 strains of bacterial leaf blight to explore their interaction to cause the disease seriousness. The result showed there were four types: Ⅰ.two strains were mutally inhibited;Ⅱ.bacterial leaf stripe(BLS) strain inhibited bacterial leaf blight(BLB) strain;Ⅲ.BLB strain inhibited BLS strain;Ⅳ.there was no inhibition between two strains. In Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅳ types, the proportion of BLS were 4 65%,13 95% and 81 40%,respectively. In Ⅰ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ types, the proportion of BLB were 12 5%,8 33% and 79 1%,respectively. The rice leaves were inoculates with both mixed strains by using acupuncture and spray treatment. The result showed both pathogenic bacteria had its own typical symptoms on the same leaf. In Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ types, disease index of BLS in mixed inoculation were -2 07,2 40,-2 52,-0 24,respectively, the difference was higher than in single inoculation. disease index of BLB in mixed inoculation were -0 89,-6 42,-0 18,3 18,respectively, the difference was higher than in compared with single inoculation. The result showed the disease seriousness of mixed inoculation by inhibited strains were less than single inoculation, but the disease index wasn't the same as inhibited strains in non\|inhibited strains.
出处 《福建农业学报》 CAS 1999年第S1期40-44,共5页 Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
关键词 水稻 细条病 白叶枯病 相互作用 Rice Bacterial leaf stripe Bacterial leaf blight Interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1何启华,赖传雅,顾家华,邹镜昌,刘武.水稻细菌性条斑病发生流行规律的观察[J]云南农业科技,1984(04).
  • 2吴培机.水稻细菌性条斑病的发生流行、病株田间分布及为害损失的初步调查[J]广西农业科学,1984(01).
  • 3蒋震同,赖文昌,柯礼道,许彩霞.嘉兴县荷花公社民主大队水稻细菌性条斑病初步调查[J]浙江农业科学,1966(01).
  • 4范怀忠,伍尚忠.广东水稻细菌性条斑病的发生和为害情况调查[J]植物保护,1965(04).
  • 5方中达,任欣正,陈泰英,朱有釭,范怀忠,伍尚忠.水稻白叶枯病及条斑病和李氏禾条斑病病原细菌的比较研究[J]植物病理学报,1957(02).
  • 6张建华,任欣正,方中达.青枯假单胞杆菌产生细菌素的研究[J]南京农业大学学报,1987(03).
  • 7韦忠民,王金生,方中达.转座子Tn5诱导菊欧氏杆菌产细菌素菌株突变的研究[J]南京农业大学学报,1987(02).
  • 8种藏文,余永钰,王长方,林朝重,卢同.水稻细菌性条斑病监测和防治对策[J].福建农业科技,1992(6):7-8. 被引量:1

共引文献14

同被引文献14

  • 1张华,胡白石,刘凤权.双重PCR技术检测水稻白叶枯病菌和细菌性条斑病菌[J].植物检疫,2007,21(S1):34-35. 被引量:7
  • 2陈功友,邹丽芳,王邢平,向勇,王金生.水稻白叶枯病菌致病性分子遗传学基础[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(9):1301-1307. 被引量:33
  • 3黄瑞荣,何月秋,文艳华,曾小萍.水稻细菌性条斑病菌与白叶枯病菌在稻叶上的相互作用研究[J].江西农业科技,1996(4):33-34. 被引量:3
  • 4卢学松,种藏文,王长方,余永钰.水稻细条病和白叶枯病菌可溶性蛋白比较研究[J]福建农业科技,1995(06).
  • 5Jeung J U, Heu S G, Shin M S, et al. Dynamics of Xan- thomonas ol.xzae pv. oryzae populations in Korea and their relationship to known bacterial blight resistance genes. Phy- topathology, 2006, 96: 867-875.
  • 6Kang M J, Shim J K, Cho M S, et al. Specific detection of Xanthomonas or3.'zae pv. or3\-.icola in infected rice plant by use of PCR assay targeting a membrane fusion protein gene. Microbiol Biotechnol, 2008, 18: 1492-1495.
  • 7Nino-Liu D O, Ronald P C, Bogdanove A J. Xanthomonas oo'zae pathovars: Model pathogens of a model crop. Molec- ular Plant Pathol, 2006, 7: 303-324.
  • 8Strange R N, Scott P R. Plant disease: A threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2005, 43: 83-116.
  • 9Mew T W. Current status and future prospects of research on bacterial blight of rice. Armu Rev Phytupathoy, 1987, 125: 539-582.
  • 10Adachi N , Oku T. PCR-mediated detection of Xanthomonas oD'zae pv. oD'zae by amplification of the 16S-23S rDNA spacer region sequence. Plant Pathology, 2000, 66: 303-309.

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部