期刊文献+

颈椎前路减压植骨融合术后邻近节段退变情况分析 被引量:8

Analysis of adjacent segment degeneration of patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析颈椎前路减压植骨融合术后融合椎体邻近节段退变的影响因素。方法选取250例行颈椎前路减压植骨融合内固定手术治疗的患者作为研究对象,观察术后邻近节段退变的发生情况,对退变患者组与无退变患者组各项观察指标进行统计学比较。结果共72例(75个节段)(28.8%)发生术后邻近节段退变,椎间盘退变程度按评分,1分48例,2分21例,3分3例;退变组术前D值(1.26±1.30)mm、术后D值(3.76±3.10)mm,明显小于无退变组的(1.90±1.30)mm与(5.85±3.04)mm(P<0.05);退变组手术后D值比术前增加(2.5±3.21)mm,明显小于无退变组的(3.95±3.13)mm(P<0.05);两组的年龄、性别分布、日本骨科学会评分(JOA评分)、Cobb’s角等无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论颈椎前路减压植骨融合术后融合椎体邻近节段退变发生率较高;颈椎前凸程度较小、且手术对颈椎前凸程度改善较小是导致邻近节段退变发生的重要影响因素。 Objective To analyze the influencing factors of adjacent segment degeneration of patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Methods Totally 250 cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were selected for study.The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration was observed and the indexes of degeneration group and non-degeneration group were compared statistically.Results There were 72 cases(75 segment) of adjacent segment degeneration(28.8%),including 48 cases of degradation score of 1,21 cases of degradation score of 2,3 cases of degradation score of 3.The preoperative D value of degradation group was(1.26±1.30)mm,while(3.76±3.10)mm after operation,indicating significantly lower than that of non-degradation group(P0.05).The postoperative D value of degradation group increased by(2.5±3.21)mm,notably lower than that of non-degradation group(3.95±3.13)mm(P0.05).The age,gender distribution,JOA score and Cobb's angle of the two groups had no statistical difference(P0.05).Conclusion The incident rate of adjacent segment degeneration in patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is high.The small degree of cervical lordosis and slight improvement of the degree of cervical lordosis after operation are important influencing factors leading to adjacent segment degeneration.
出处 《创伤外科杂志》 2011年第6期507-509,共3页 Journal of Traumatic Surgery
关键词 颈椎 植骨融合术 椎间盘退变 cervical bone fusion intervertebral disc degeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

  • 1罗任,周东,林崇山.颈前路减压植骨钢板内固定术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效分析(附23例报告)[J].脊柱外科杂志,2005,3(2):80-82. 被引量:9
  • 2刘先银,莫新发,何仲佳,朱文雄,周雪明,曾昕明,郭建恩,卓新明.颈椎前路椎体次全切除结合植骨内固定术治疗脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(6):367-369. 被引量:18
  • 3Hilibrand A S,Robbins M.Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease:the consequences of spinal fusion?[J].Spine,2004,4(6):190-194.
  • 4Levin D A,Hale J J,Bendo J A.Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease[J].Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis,2007,65(1):29-36.
  • 5Robertson J T,Papadopoulos S M,Traynelis V C.Assessmenof adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervica fusion or arthroplasty.A prospective 2-year study[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,3(6):417-423.
  • 6Lopez-Espina C G,Amirouche F,Havalad V.Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation[J].Spine,2006,31(9):972-978.
  • 7Goffin J,Geusens E,Vantomme N.Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2004,17(2):79-85.
  • 8Eck J C,Humphreys S C,Lim T H,et al.Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion[J].Spine,2002,27(22):2431-2434.
  • 9Yue W M,Brodner W,Highland T R.Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating.A 5-to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study[J].Spine,2005,30(19):2138-2144.
  • 10Ishihara H,Kanamori M,Kawaguchi Y,et al.Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion[J].Spine J,2004,4(6):624-628.

共引文献66

同被引文献96

  • 1张睿,周文钰,顾洪生,刘伟强,白波,王大平.颈椎单节段融合术后相邻各节段运动补偿的规律研究[J].中国临床实用医学,2014,5(1). 被引量:4
  • 2袁文,王新伟,贾连顺.颈椎病手术治疗的相关问题探讨[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):325-329. 被引量:37
  • 3高志增,曹凯,张志宏,舒勇,韩智敏.前路钢板对脊髓型颈椎病术后脊柱生理曲度恢复的研究[J].江西医药,2007,42(6):485-487. 被引量:2
  • 4Jeong Yoon Park,Kyung Hyun Kim,Sung Uk Kuh,et al. What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery?Comparative study between anterior cer- vical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT [J]. Eur Spine, 2013,22(5) : 1078-1089.
  • 5Hilibrand AS,Yoo JU ,Carlson GD,et al. The success of anterior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion [J]. Spine, 1997, 22(14): 1574-1579.
  • 6Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D ,et al. Anterior cervical decom- pression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study[J]. Spine, 2010,35 ( 1 ) : 36-43.
  • 7Nabhan A,Ishak B,Steudel WI,et al. Assessment of adjacent-seg- ment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion:RCT with 1 year's results[J]. Eur Spine J, 2011,20(6) :934-941.
  • 8Watanahc S, Inouc N, Yamaguchi T, et M. Three-dimensional kinc- matic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decom- pression and fusion at an adjacent level:a preliminary report[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012,21(5) : 946-955.
  • 9Millward-Sadler SJ,Costello PW,Freemont AJ,et al. Regulation of catabolic gene expression in normal and degenerate human in- tervertebral disc cells :implications for the pathogenesis of inter- vertebral disc de,,eneration[Jl. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009.11(3):65.
  • 10John Olsewski ,MD et al. Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degener- ation in the Cervical[J]. Spine ,2011,181(8):72.

引证文献8

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部