期刊文献+

4种指标在腹水鉴别诊断中的意义 被引量:6

Significance of four parameters in differential diagnosis of ascites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、癌胚抗原(CEA)及血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(SAAG)在不同病因腹水中的临床意义。方法检测139例腹水患者腹水中ADA、LDH、CEA和SAAG等4种指标,用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)对它们在腹水病因鉴别诊断中的临床价值进行评估。结果 ADA水平以结核性腹水组为最高,恶性腹水组次之;LDH以恶性腹水组最高,结核性腹水组次之,门脉高压性腹水组最低;CEA含量以恶性腹水组为最高,其余3组含量相当;SAAG以门脉高压性腹水组和肝硬化伴自发性腹膜炎组为最高。结论联合检测腹水ADA、LDH、CEA及SAAG对腹水病因的鉴别诊断有重要的临床价值。 Objective To study the clinical significance of adenosine deaminase (ADA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) , carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in ascites of different etiologies. Methods The ascitic ADA, LDH, CEA and SAAG levels were measured in 139 patients with ascites. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of 4 parameters in differential diagnosis of ascites. Results ADA level in tuberculous aseites group was the highest, followed by malignant ascites. LDH level in malignant ascites was the highest, followed by tuberculous ascites, portal hypertension group was the lowest. CEA was present at the highest level in malignant ascites and a similar level in other three groups. SAAG in ascites caused by portal hypertension or liver cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was the highest. Conclusion Simultaneous detection of ADA, LDH, CEA and SAAG in ascites may play an important role in differential diagnosis for the causes of ascites.
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2011年第10期945-947,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
关键词 腺苷脱氨酶 乳酸脱氢酶 癌胚抗原 血清-腹水白蛋白梯度 腹水 Adenosine deaminase Lactate dehydrogenase Careinoembryonic antigen Serum-ascites albumin gradient Ascites
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

共引文献73

同被引文献43

  • 1李鲁娟,皇甫超申.肝豆状核变性误诊19例[J].第四军医大学学报,2003,24(18):1646-1646. 被引量:2
  • 2黄家淼,杨剑,周仁荣,胡健.腹水/血清肿瘤标志物对良恶性腹水的鉴别价值[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(15):1533-1536. 被引量:18
  • 3王苏华,朱以军.胸、腹水与血清癌胚抗原检测对良恶性胸、腹水鉴别诊断的价值[J].检验医学,2007,22(4):448-450. 被引量:8
  • 4Mahmood G,Debnath CR?Mandal AK. Evaluation of 100cases of ascites[J]. Mymensingh Med J,200 9 ,18(1):62-66.
  • 5Cerbes AL,Jiinst D,Xie YN. Ascitic fluid analysis for thedifferentiation of malignancy-related and nonmalignant as-cites. Proposal of a diagnostic sequence[J]. Cancer,1991,68(8):1808-1814.
  • 6Czepczynska-Krezel H, Krop-Watorek A. Human carcino-embryonic antigen family proteins, structure and function[J]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online),2012,66:521-533.
  • 7Molina V, Visa L, Conill C,et al. CA 19-9 in pancreaticcancer j retrospective evaluation of patients with suspicionof pancreatic cancer[J], Tumour Biol, 2012,33 (3) : 799-807.
  • 8Bhargava DK,Deaminase GA. In peritoneal tuberculosis :diagnostic value in ascitic fluid and serum[J]. Tuberculo-sis,1990,71(2) :121-126.
  • 9Yoon YJ, Ahn SH?Park JY,et al. What is the role of di-agnostic laparoscopy in a gastroenterology unit? [J]. JGastroenterol, 2007 ,42(11) . 881-886.
  • 10Han CM,Lee CL,Huang KG,et al. Diagnostic laparosco-py in ascites of unknown origin: Chang Gung MemorialHospital 20-year experience [J]. Chang Gung Med J,2008,31(4):378-383.

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部