论“同一多异律”──“同一律”及“一同二异律”的现代发展问题之我见

On the Law of Identity of Diversity

亚里士多德的“同一律”是人们进行正常逻辑思维的十分重要的基本规范，在认识史上起了重大作用。但其躲开矛盾，回避万事万物有异、是异、多异的僵死空洞教条方法，在历史上害处甚多，更不相应今日科技水平与社会变革的现实需要。黑格尔辩证逻辑以“一同二异律”弥补了“同一律”在“异”上的缺陷，但其只重矛盾、对立，忽视事物现象的多元多极多异及协同平衡。“同一多异律”从“逻辑是发展的”出发，改善发展了前两律，立一新律以应时代之需。

Abstract Aristotle's law of identity evades contradictions and neglects the fact that things in nature are various, different and diverse. The law in fact was a rigid, impractical dogma, which has been harmful in history and cannotmeet the current needs of scientific and technological development and social change Hegal's law of initial identity and secondary diversity makes up the fault of the law of identity on the aspect of 'diversity'.But Hegal's law emphasizes contradiction and contrariety and overlooks the pluralistic, multipolra and diverse qualities of phenomena in nature and ignores the balance between them. the law of identity of diversity, based on the prin-ciple 'logic is under constant development', modifies aad advances the two previous laws so as to meet the needs of the present.