马歇尔“折衷主义”一说的来龙去脉

THE CONTEXT OF THE VIEW OF "ECLECTICISM" CONCERNING MARSHALL SYSTEM

关于马歇尔体系特征的概括和评价，历来存在明显的歧异。大多数西方学者都采用“综合”一词予以肯定和颂扬。始终冠以“折衷主义”提法的是原苏联学者，不过他们并未全盘否定它。我国学者的有关论述则先后经历了三个阶段。必须强调，搞清“折衷主义”这种概括和评价的来龙去脉，对于准确把握马氏学说和重新审视经济学史研究的若干传统见解，具有重要的意义。

There have always been strikingly different interpretations of the summary and review of the features of Marshall System. In reviewing Marshall System, most Western scholars affirm and eulogize it with the weal 'synthesis', scholars from the former Soviet Union use 'eclecticism', however, they do not negate it completely. Chinese schoolars have undergone three stages. We must emphasize that it is of great significance in grasping Marshall theory correctly and reexamining some traditional views about the researches in the history of economics to get a clear understanding of the context of the summary and review of 'eclectioncism'.