循环输注与持续输注胃肠外营养的效果对比

Comparison of the effect of standard continuous and cyclic parenteral nutrition

本文报告了20例中等分解代谢患者在严格对比条件下,对持续胃肠外营养(STPN)与循环胃肠外营养(C-TPN)两种不同输注方法的营养支持效果进行了前瞻性对比研究,检测项目分六大类共48项,全部数据经统计学处理。结果表明两种输注方法的营养支持效果及对脏器功能的影响相同。作者认为对住院患者S-TPN是一种良好的营养支持方法,对家庭胃肠外营养患者C-TPN则能显示出它的优越性。

The paper reported the results of prospective study on the effects of standard continuous total parenteral nutrition (S-TPN) and cyclic total parenteral nutrition (C-TPN) in 20 hospitalized patients with middle catabolism. The study course continued for 20 days. The observation indexes were divided into 6 kinds including 48 items. All data were treated statistically. The study results showed that the effects with S-TPN and C-TPN on the metabolism of glucose, protein and fat, incretory functions, immune functions, vital organ functions and body weigh were quite the same. The authers considered that S-TPN was a good way for nutritional maintenance in hospitalized patients, C-TPN could show its superiority for patients treated with parenteral nutrition at home.