期刊文献+

投资者现状偏见及其影响因素的实验研究 被引量:7

An Experimental Study on the Status Quo Bias of Investors and Its Impact Factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 现状偏见是影响投资者决策的一个重要因素,现有的研究主要利用前景理论对其进行阐释。框架效应、投资者情绪以及信息结构在投资者现状偏见中发挥着重要作用,本文利用实验的方法研究了三者对投资者现状偏见的影响,研究结果表明:差值投资组合框架中投资者被试的现状偏见程度高于比率投资组合框架中投资者被试的现状偏见程度;三种情绪组中均存在投资者现状偏见,积极情绪下被试的偏见水平较低,消极情绪下被试的偏见水平较高;被试选择信息结构确定的选项是选择信息模糊选项的5倍,投资者被试对外在现状赋值的偏见程度小于自我现状赋值。 The status quo bias is an important factor which affects investors' decision-making.The existing researches on this issue only consider Prospects Theory.In fact,framing effect,investor sentiment and information structure are also important variables which affect the status quo bias.But the existing literature is less involved to study status quo bias from the three aspects above.This paper researches the influence on the Status Quo Bias of Investors from the three aspects of framing effect,investor sentiment and information structure in the experimental method.The results show that: the investor status quo bias in the margined frame of the investment portfolio is higher than that in the ratio frame of the investable portfolio.There is status quo bias of investors in the three emotions conditions.In the positive emotions the status quo bias of investors is lower and in the negative emotions the status quo bias of investors is higher.Choices of the determined probability are made five times more than those of uncertain probability are.The level of status quo bias in self-status assignment group is higher than that in external status assignment group.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期151-159,共9页 Management Review
基金 国家社科基金重大招标课题(10zd&035) 国家自然科学基金项目(70972086 71172068) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(10JJD630002)
关键词 现状偏见 框架效应 投资者情绪 信息结构 status quo bias framing effect investor sentiment information structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Bourne G. R. Proximate Costs and Benefits of Mate Acquisition at Leks of the Frog Ololygon Rubra[J]. Animal Behaviour, 1993,45 (6):1051-1059.
  • 2Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988,1(1):7-59.
  • 3Kahneaman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making under Risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979,47(3):63-91.
  • 4Tversky A., Kahneaman D. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991,106(4):1039-1061.
  • 5Kahneaman D. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics[J]. American Economic Review, 2003,93(5): 1449-1475.
  • 6Gilovich T., Medvec V. H. The Temporal Pattern to the Experience of Regret[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67(33):357-365.
  • 7Bomnger D. S., Gleicher F., Strathman A. Counterfactual Thinking: From What Might Have Been to What May Be[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994,67(22):297-307.
  • 8Kahneman D., Miller D. T. Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives[J]. Psychology Review, 1986,93(2):136-153.
  • 9Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty[J]. The Economic Journal, 1982, 92(368):805-824.
  • 10Loomes G. Further Evidence of the Impact of Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty[J]. Economica, 1988,55(217):47-62.

二级参考文献37

  • 1施俊琦,王垒,彭凯平.作为效应的象征性与利益性影响因素:后悔理论的经济心理学分析[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):1016-1018. 被引量:10
  • 2王筱璐,时勘,宋逢明,陈卓思.我国行为金融学研究的心理学思考[J].管理评论,2004,16(11):58-62. 被引量:5
  • 3杨秀萍,王素霞.行为金融学的投资者风险偏好探析[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(1):24-29. 被引量:12
  • 4Wang X T,Cognition,1996年,60卷,31页
  • 5Wang X T,Ethol Sociobiol,1996年,17卷,1页
  • 6Wang X T,Organ Behav Human Decis Process,1996年,68卷,2期,145页
  • 7张结海.短期后悔和长期后悔的差异,三种不同的解释[J].心理学动态,2000,8(4):63-68.
  • 8Sugden, R, Regret, recrimination and rationality. Theory and Decision, 1985, 19: 77-99.
  • 9Kelsey, D & Schepanski, A, Regret and disappointment in taxpayer reporting decision: An experiment study. Journal of Behavioral Decesion Making, 1991, 4: 33- 51.
  • 10geelenberg, M, On the importance of what might have been:Psychological perspectives on regret and decision making. Ph D dissertation, University of Amsterdam 1996.

共引文献45

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部