反垄断损害赔偿制度的构建——基于《反垄断法》第50条的思考

On the Antitrust Liability for Damages Construction——Reflection of the Article 50 of Anti-monopoly Law

反垄断损害赔偿责任与民事损害赔偿责任在目的、构成要件及实现方式等方面都有着显著的区别。但是我国现行的《反垄断法》第50条无视两者的这些差别,规定极为简单,并以民法为依据,这无疑会影响到我国《反垄断法》的实施效果。因此,应当在《反垄断法》中更为明确地规定反垄断损害赔偿制度。

There are such differences between antitrust liability for damages and civil liability for damages, as their purpose, components, and the ways of achieving. But article 50 of Anti-monopoly Law in our country is very simple and based on civil law, affects the implementation of antitrust effect. Therefore, legislators should provide antitrust liability for damages clearly in Anti-monopoly Law.