摘要
在对《哈姆莱特》所作的各种解释中,弗洛伊德式的精神分析解释无疑是极为重要的一种。这种解释的支点是将哈姆莱特之谜纳入俄狄浦斯情结的结构之中。但是,拉康作为精神分析的革命者,却从自己的理论逻辑出发,得出了与弗洛伊德完全不同的结论。他们之间的根本差异在于:在弗洛伊德那里,这出悲剧的关键是哈姆莱特对母亲的欲望;而在拉康这里,关键是哈姆莱特母亲的欲望,菲勒斯被拉康用来表示母亲欲望的能指。
In various interpretations of Hamlet,and the Freudian is one of the most important.The pivot of this interpretation is to explain the riddle of Hamlet with Oedipus complex.However,Lacan,as a revolutionist of psychoanalysis,reaches a different conclusion in terms of his own logic.The essential difference between them lies in this fact: with Freud,the key of this play is Hamlet's desire for his mother,whereas with Lacan,it is his mother's desire.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期44-51,共8页
Journal of Renmin University of China