由考证学走向史料学——从中共“一大”几份资料谈起

From Textual Criticism to Documentology——And about Resources about the First Congress of the CPC

本文对中共"一大"研究中现今仍被视作重要史料的几份资料——即陈潭秋《第一次代表大会的回忆》、葛萨廖夫《中国共产党的初期革命活动》和《董必武给何叔衡的信(1929年12月31日)》——进行探讨。通过探讨,我们将看到,在共和国时期党史研究中,史料的翻译、整理、编纂等都受到意识形态的影响。因此,今后中共"一大"研究所需要的,不是对现有各种资料进行比对的"考证学",而是充分斟酌资料内容、资料生成过程的"史料学"。

This paper probes several documents that are still considered as important historical resources about the history of the CPC nowadays - Chen Tanqiu＇s ＂Memories of the First Congress of the CPC＂, Gesa Korolyov＇s ＂Early Revolutionary Activities of the CPC＂, and the letter from Dong Biwu to He Shuheng （December 31, 1929）. Through discussion, we will see that the translation, collation and compilation of historical data are deeply influenced by ideology after the establishment of the PRC. Therefore, what the research of the first Congress of the CPC needs in the future is not textual criticism of existing data, but documentology that fully appropriates data content and data generation process.