期刊文献+

中国英语学习者口语语料复数标记变异研究 被引量:3

A study on the variations of the plural marking in Chinese EFL student speech
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究基于中国英语学习者口语语料,考察中国英语学习者复数标记的变异状况及其影响因素。分属三个水平组的91名大学生参加了本研究。在数据分析基础上,我们得出如下结论:第一,复数标记变异的主要形式并不局限于正确的复数标记和标记缺失,还包括零标记及单数名词被标记。第二,复数标记变异具有系统性,受语音、语义、句法和词汇层面不同程度的显著影响。语义层面是最重要的影响因素,而句法层面则是最弱的因素。第三,复数标记变异的影响因素与语体的相关性较弱。第四,本研究结果为激发假说而非效率理论提供了部分支撑,证实冗余复数信息是复数标记主要的影响因素,二者的紧密关联体现了复数习得的阶段性发展过程。 Based on data from Chinese EFL-student speech,this article explores variations in plural marking and possible factors contributing to the variations.Ninety-one college students at three proficiency levels participated in the study,which yielded the following findings.First,variants of plural marking were not limited to marked plural nouns and unmarked plural nouns,but also included bare nouns and marked singular nouns.Second,there were systematic variations,of different degrees,owing to phonological,semantic,syntactic,and lexical factors.Semantics was found to produce the most important effect on plural marking while syntax had the weakest correlation with plural marking.Third,factors that conditioned plural marking did not show great differences between speech and writing.Fourth,results provided partial support for the priming hypothesis instead of efficiency arguments and pointed to a close relationship between redundant plural information and plural marking,a relationship which reflects a developmental process of the acquisition of plurals.
作者 胡敏
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期864-876,960,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1胡敏.中国英语学习者书面语料复数标记的变异研究[J].现代外语,2011,34(2):187-194. 被引量:6
  • 2鲍贵.英语学习者语言复杂性变化对比研究[J].现代外语,2010,33(2):166-176. 被引量:74
  • 3姜德杰,尹洪山.汉英中介语语法中的复数标记[J].青岛大学师范学院学报,2010,27(1):111-115. 被引量:3
  • 4Littlewood,W.The transmission of functional information and social information inlearner’’s speech. Sociolinguistics . 1978
  • 5Maas,F.The English competence of Cuban exiles:The case of noun pluralization. Focus on the USA . 1996
  • 6Oggs,A.,R Sabino,L.Boone,M.Hu,.Diamond.Noun plural variability inESL:Theoretical &pedagogical implications. the 73rd South-eastern Conference on Linguistics . 2006
  • 7Sabino,R.Plurality and redundancy. the 77th SoutheasternConference on Linguistics . 2010
  • 8VanPatten,B.Cognitive aspects of input processing in second language acquisition. Studies in SecondLanguage Learning and Spanish Linguistics in Honor of Tracy D.Terrell . 1995
  • 9Young,R.Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Lan-guage Acquisition . 1988
  • 10Chafe,W.Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writ-ing. Literacy,Language andLearning:The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing . 1985

二级参考文献63

  • 1戴炜栋,蔡龙权.中介语的认知发生基础[J].外语与外语教学,2001(9):2-5. 被引量:148
  • 2文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇变化的趋势与特点[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):189-195. 被引量:116
  • 3文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇进步模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2006(4):3-8. 被引量:23
  • 4Beers, S. F. & W. E. Nagy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which register? [J]. Read Writ 22: 185-200.
  • 5Baba, K. 2009. Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 18,191-208.
  • 6Berman, R. A. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5, 1 : 1-43.
  • 7Chastain, K. 1990. Characteristics of graded and ungraded compositions [J]. The Modern Language Journal 74, 1: 10-14.
  • 8Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review [J!. Canadian Journal of Education 8, 1: 1-16.
  • 9Engber, C. A. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of L2 compositions[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 4: 139-155.
  • 10Foster, P., A. Tonkyn & G. Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons [J]. Applied Linguistics 21, 3: 354-375.

共引文献79

同被引文献73

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部