组织中心型关系模式、创造性工作氛围与员工创造性被引量：7

下载PDF

导出

摘要依据组织氛围相关理论,分析论证了创造性工作氛围对组织中心型关系模式与员工创造性之间关系的中介作用,探讨了创造性工作氛围与内在动机之间的关系。并以534名来自我国10家企业的员工为样本,运用层次回归分析方法,分析得出:创造性工作氛围与员工创造性正相关;组织中心型关系模式下的创造性工作氛围相对于其它关系模式而言,表现最高;创造性工作氛围对组织中心型关系模式与员工创造性之间的关系具有中介作用;作为组织中心型关系模式与员工创造性之间关系的两个中介变量,"内在动机"和"创造性工作氛围"之间具有正向互动关系。最后,讨论了研究结果的理论意义和实践意义。

作者郭桂梅赵曙明

机构地区南京大学商学院陕西师范大学国际商学院

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第22期146-150,共5页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目(70732002) 中国博士后科学基金项目(20100471284) 江苏省博士后科学基金项目(0902072C)

关键词组织中心型关系模式创造性工作氛围创造性内在动机

分类号 F240 [经济管理—劳动经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1PIL F K,COHEN S K. Modularity: Implications for imita tion, innovation, and sustained advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4) :995-1 011.
2郭桂梅,段兴民.员工-组织关系、内在动机与员工创造性——中国企业的实证研究[J].管理评论,2008,20(3):16-24. 被引量：15
3TSUI A S, WANG D. Employment relationships trom the employer's perspective: Current research and future directions[J]//COOPER C L, ROBERTSON C L, et al. International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 2002,17 : 77-114.
4TSUI A S, PEARCE J L, PORTER L W, et al. Alternative approaches to the employeeorganization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? [J]. Academy of Management Jounnal,1997,40(5) :1 089-1 121.
5BANDURA A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control [ M]. New York: Freeman, 1996.
6SCHNEIDER B. Organizational climates: An essay[J]. Personnel Psychology,1975,28(4) :447-479.
7SALANCIK G R,PFEFFER J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1978,23(2):224-253.
8ANDERSON N R,WEST M A. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1998,19(3) :235-258.
9RENLSCH J R. Climate and culture:Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990,75(6) :668-681.
10TUSHMAN M L,O'REILLY C A. Winning through innovation:A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1997.

二级参考文献22

1Deci, E. L., & R. M. Ryan. Intrinsic motivation and serf-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
2McGraw, K. O., & J. Fiala. Undermining the Zeigamik effect: Another hidden cost of reward. Journal of Personality, 1982, 50(1): 58-66.
3Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control . New York: Freeman, 1996.
4Shalley, C. E., L. L. Gilson, & T. C. Blum. Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intention to leave . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2): 215-223.
5Tsui,A.S., D.X. Wang, & Y.C. Zhang. Employment relationships with Chinese middle managers: Exploring differences between state-owned and non-state-owned finns . In A.S. Tsui & C.M. Lau (Eds.), The Management of Enterprises in the People's Republic of China, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
6George, J. M., & J. Zhou. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior:. An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3): 513-524.
7Baron, R. M., & D. A. Kenny. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
8Oldham, G. R., & A. Cummings. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 607-634.
9Baer, M., G. R. Oldham, & A. Cummings. Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14(4/5): 569-586.
10Tiemey, P., S. M. Farmer, & G. B. Graen. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevanc of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52(3): 591-620.