期刊文献+

强制性外交研究——以伊朗核问题为视角

下载PDF
导出
摘要 众多学者认为,强制性外交是对纯军事对抗或者赤裸裸战争的一种有效补充,原因在于它本质上是一种节省成本的治国策略。由于伊朗核问题牵涉错综复杂的利益分割,美伊双方利用各种有利于自己的方式,针锋相对,明争暗斗,相互博弈,双方都不愿意把自己推到风头浪尖的"死角",尽量规避孤立无援的劣势,因此,伊朗核问题为检视美国强制性外交的实效提供了新的平台。本文以美国强制性外交策略为切入点,梳理它在应对伊朗核问题上的基本历程,探讨它在该问题下的效用和局限。
作者 魏光启
出处 《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第6期82-86,共5页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 阜阳师范学院2010年人文社科项目"强制性外交研究"(2010FSSK12)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1钱春泰.美国与强制外交理论[J].美国研究,2006,20(3):49-64. 被引量:13
  • 2Alexander L.George,David K.Hall,William E.Simons.The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy. . 1994
  • 3Iran Hands Report on Stopping Uranium EnrichmentActivity to IAEA. . 2003
  • 4Iran’’s Nuclear Programme:A Collection of Docu-ments.Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for For-eign and Commonwealth Affairs. ht-tp://www.fco.gov.ukPfilesPkfilePcm6443 . 2005
  • 5Karl Vick.Another Nuclear Program Found in Iran. The Washington Post . 2004
  • 6Richard Burnstein.Europeans Criticize Iran’’s Plan toStart Up Enrichment Plant. The New York Times . 2003
  • 7Text of European Union’’’’s Proposal to Iran. . 2005
  • 8Louis Charbonneau.Iran has until July to consideratomic offer:Austria. . 2006
  • 9Security Council Demands Iran Suspend UraniumEnrichment by 31 August,or Face Possible Economic,Diplo-matic Sanctions. . 2006
  • 10Greg Bruno,Staff Writer.Iran’’s Nuclear Pro-gram.Council on foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/publication/16811/irans-nuclear-program.html?breadcrumb=%2F . 2008

二级参考文献36

  • 1[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著 阎学通 陈寒溪.《争论中的国际关系理论》[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003年版.第631页.
  • 2Alexander L. George and William E. Simons,eds. , The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy 2nd edn. (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994),pp. 7-10.pp.8-9.p.54.pp.270-290.p.16.p.281.p.288.
  • 3Alexander L. George, ed. , Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management (Boulder, Colo:Westview Press, 1991), p. 380.
  • 4Gary Schaub, "Compellence: Resuscitating the Concept," Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases, ed. Lawrence Freedman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 38.p.329.pp.58-59.
  • 5Robert S. Ross, "The 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force," International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), p. 88.
  • 6Mark R. Amstutz, International Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to World Politics (Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999), pp. 210-211.
  • 7Gordon A. Craig and Alexander L. George, Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time, 3rd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 196.
  • 8Charles W. Kegley and Gregory A. Raymond, From War to Peace: Fateful Decisions in International Politics (Peking University Press & Thomson Learning, 2003), p. 275.
  • 9Peter Viggo Jakobsen, Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War: A Challenge for Theory and Practice (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 100-101.pp.20-23.
  • 10Alexander L. George, "The Role of Force in Diplomacy: A Continuing Dilemma for U.S. Foreign Policy," The Use of Force after the Cold War, ed. H. W. Brands (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2000), p. 81.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部