摘要
民事诉讼中当事人和解与法院调解及诉讼上和解均属于合意解决民事纠纷的方式,在形式上或名称上具有一定的相似性,容易混淆视听,应予以辨析区别。尽管民事诉讼和解属私法行为,并且在当前强调调解的司法语境下,和解存在的制度空间被极度挤压,但民事诉讼法还应对其加以规定。因为从保障当事人权利角度出发,应赋予当事人更多的程序选择权,现代民事诉讼程序也应保障当事人更多没有被纳入法律保护体系的利益需求的实现。
In civil lawsuit proceedings,party reconciliation,court mediation and action reconciliation all belong to accord civil dispute resolution.They are liable to confusion due to the similarity in operation form and technical terms,and clear differentiation is thus vitally important.Although party reconciliation is private in nature,and court mediation is more encouraged in the current judicial context.The existing space of reconciliation is extremely squeezed,party reconciliation should be stipulated in civil procedure law.The civil law procedure should endow the parties with more procedure options to protect their rights,and modern civil lawsuit procedure should also secure the parties with more interest needs which are not yet included in the law protection system.
出处
《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第6期111-116,共6页
Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
法院调解
诉讼上和解
当事人和解
民事诉讼
court mediation
action reconciliation
party reconciliation
civil lawsuit