期刊文献+

Early monitoring of response to antimetabolic treatment of gemcitabine:A comparison of ^(18)F-FLT and ^(18)F-FDG uptake in Patu 8988 human pancreatic carcinoma cells 被引量:2

Early monitoring of response to antimetabolic treatment of gemcitabine:A comparison of ^(18)F-FLT and ^(18)F-FDG uptake in Patu 8988 human pancreatic carcinoma cells
下载PDF
导出
摘要 It is essential to predict the treatment efficacy of pancreatic carcinoma early.The purpose of this study was to examine whether ^(18)F-FDG(2'-deoxy-2'-[^(18)F]fiuoro-D-glucose) or ^(18)F-FLT(3'-deoxy-3'-^(18)F-fluorothymidine) PET can be used for chemosensitivity testing by investigating the binding characteristic of ^(18)F-FDG or ^(18)F-FLT with Patu 8988 human pancreatic carcinoma cell and the influence of gemcitabine in the uptake of ^(18)F-FDG or ^(18)F-FLT on Patu 8988.Under the conditions of 1×10~6 cells,3.7 kBq ^(18)F-FDG or ^(18)F-FLT,and incubation at 37℃for 100 min,the cell uptake of ^(18)F-FDG and ^(18)F-FLT was(60.60±3.05)%and(50.57±2.81)%,respectively.There was a significant decrease in TKl-LI(thymidine kinase 1 labeling index) 24 h after administration of gemcitabine.The uptakes of ^(18)F-FDG and ^(18)F-FLT were negatively correlated with the doses of gemcitabine(r= -0.928 for ^(18)F-FDG,r= -0.876 for ^(18)F-FLT,P<0.01).When same doses of gemcitabine were administered,the ^(18)F-FLT uptake inhibition rate was significantly higher than that of ^(18)F-FDG(P<0.01).These results indicate that the response to gemcitabine could be predicted as early as 24 h by ^(18)F-FDG or ^(18)F-FLT PET scans.^(18)F-FLT is more sensitive than ^(18)F-FDG to predict the response to therapy. It is essential to predict the treatment efficacy of pancreatic carcinoma early. The purpose of this study was to examine whether ^18 F-FDG (2'-deoxy-2'-[^18F]fluoro-D-glucose) or ^18F-FLT (3'-deoxy-3'-^18 F-fluorothymidine) PET can be used for chemosensitivity testing by investigating the binding characteristic of ^18F-FDG or ^18F-FLT with Patu 8988 human pancreatic carcinoma cell and the influence of gemcitabine in the uptake of ^18F-FDG or ^18F-FLT on Patu 8988. Under the conditions of 1 × 10^6 cells, 3.7 kBq ^18F-FDG or ^18F-FLT, and incubation at 37℃ for 100 rain, the cell uptake of 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT was (60.60±3.05)% and (50.57±2.81)%, respectively. There was a significant decrease in TK1-LI (thymidine kinase 1 labeling index) 24 h after administration of gemcitabine. The uptakes of 18F-FDG and ^18F-FLT were negatively correlated with the doses of gemcitabine (r= -0.928 for ^18F-FDG, r= -0.876 for ^18 F-FLT, P〈0.01). When same doses of gemcitabine were administered, the ^18F-FLT uptake inhibition rate was significantly higher than that of ^18F-FDG (P〈0.01). These results indicate that the response to gemcitabine could be predicted as early as 24 h by ^18F-FDG or ^18F-FLT PET scans. ^18F-FLT is more sensitive than ^18F-FDG to predict the response to therapy.
出处 《Nuclear Science and Techniques》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第5期293-298,共6页 核技术(英文)
基金 Supported by Key Laboratory Program of Nuclear Medicine,Ministry of Health of China(Grant No.KF200904)
关键词 细胞摄取 早期预测 治疗效果 FDG 癌细胞 胰腺癌 LSF 药物敏感性 Pancreatic carcinoma, Uptake, Gemcitabine, ^18F-FDG, ^18F-FLT
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ahn S H, Garewalb H S, Dragovich T. J Buon, 2008, 13: 359-362.
  • 2Song S L, Liu J J, Huang G, J Nucl Med, 2008, 49: 303-309.
  • 3Sugiyama M, Sakahara H, Sato K. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1754-1758.
  • 4Yamane T, Daimaru O, Ito S. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1838-1842.
  • 5Nahmias C, Hanna W T, Wahl L M. J Nucl Med, 2007, 48: 744-751.
  • 6Wagner M, Seitz U, Buck A. Cancer Res, 2003, 63: 2681-2687.
  • 7Herrrnann K, Wieder H A, Buck A K. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13: 3552-3558.
  • 8Kenny L, Coombes R C, Vigushin D M. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2007, 34: 1339-1347.
  • 9Kong X B, Zhu Q Y, Vidal P M. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1992, 36: 808-818.
  • 10Shi Z, Azuma A, Sampath D. Cancer Res, 2001, 61: 1065-1072.

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部