期刊文献+

超声造影对盆腔肿块定性诊断的初步研究 被引量:11

Characterization of complex pelvic masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声造影对盆腔肿块的定性诊断价值。方法对137例盆腔肿块患者进行超声造影检查,依据肿瘤的影像增强特征作出定性诊断,结果与病理对照,应用诊断性试验对超声造影的定性诊断效能进行评估。结果超声造影定性诊断恶性病灶的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性及ROC曲线下面积分别为85.3%(29/34)、93.2%(96/103)、80.6%(29/36)、95.0%(99/101)、91.2%(125/137)、0.892。结论超声造影为临床定性诊断盆腔肿块提供了一种简单准确的新方法。 Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in characterization of pelvic masses. Methods Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed on 137 patients with pelvic masses. The results were compared to pathological diagnostic criteria. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by using diagnostic test. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under ROC curve in diagnosing complex pelvic masses by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound were as follows: 85.3% (29/34), 93.2% (96/103), 80.6% (29/36), 95.0% ( 99/101 ), 91.2% ( 125/137 ), 0. 892, respectively. Conclusions Contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides a simple and curate method for characterization of pelvic masses.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期968-971,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 卫生部公益性行业科研专项基金(20070210)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 盆腔肿瘤 盆腔炎性疾病 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Pelvic neoplasms Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Correas JM, Tranquart F, Claudon M. Guidelines for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) update 2008. J Radiol, 2009,90: 123- 138.
  • 2Piscaglia F, Lencioni R,Sagrini E, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2010,36 : 531-550.
  • 3Xie XH, Xu HX, Xie XY, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder diseases with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol, 20l 0,20 : 239- 248.
  • 4张新玲,黄冬梅,毛永江,宋倩,郑志娟,李玉华,郑荣琴.卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转的超声造影增强特点[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2010(3):245-247. 被引量:9
  • 5戴晴,刘真真,姜玉新,杨佳欣,吕珂,冷金花,高嫔.经阴道超声造影在附件包块诊断中的应用研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(9):693-697. 被引量:37
  • 6Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Belle V, et al. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses with solid components. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2009,34:699-710.
  • 7Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B0 et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med ,2004,23 : 1629-1639.
  • 8Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Coccia ME, et al. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies:results of a multicenter European study. J Ultrasound Med,2002,21 :1105-1111.
  • 9Sladkevicius P, Jokubkiene L, Valentin NL. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007,311) : 874-882.
  • 10Ord6n MR, Jurvelin JS, Kirkinen PP. Kinetics of US contrast agents in benign and malignant pelvic tumors. Radiology, 2003, 26 : 405-4 1 0.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Sarah C,Fischer A,Barber R,et al.Cannot exclude torsion-a 15year review.J Pediatr Surg,2009,44:1212-1217.
  • 2Linam LE,Darolia R,Naffaa LN,et al.US findings of adnexal torsion in children and adolescents:size really does matter.Pediatr Radiol,2007,37:1013-1019.
  • 3Andreotti RF,Shadinger LL,Fleischer AC.The sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion:pearls and pitfalls.Ultrasound Clin,2007,2:155-166.
  • 4Gococmen A,Karaca M,Sari A.Conservative laparoscopic approach to adnexal torsion.Arch Gynecol Obstetr,2008,277:535-538.
  • 5Bartolotta TV,Midiri M,Quaia E,etal.Focal liver lesions:spectrum of findings on SonoVue-enhanced pulse-inversionultrasonography.Eur Radiol,2005,15:1643-1649.
  • 6Nicolau C,Catalá V,Vilana R,et al.Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma usingSonoVue,a second generation ultrasound contrast agent:correlation with cellulardifferentiation.Eur Radiol,2004,14:1092-1099.
  • 7Abramowicz JS.Ultrasonographic contrast media:has the time come in obstetrics andgynecology? J Ultrasound Med,2005,24:517-531.
  • 8D'Arcy TJ,Jayaram V,Lynch M,et al.Ovarian cancer detected non-invasively bycontrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound.Br J Obstet Gynecol,2004,111:619-622.
  • 9Folkman J.Tumor angiogenesis.Adv Cancer Res,1985,43:174-176.
  • 10Burns PN,Wilson SR,Simpson DH,et al.Pulse inversion imaging of liver bloodflow:improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast.InvestRadiol,2000,35:58-71.

共引文献43

同被引文献77

  • 1黄冬梅,李凯,郑荣琴,张新玲,杨丽新,朱承明.输卵管妊娠的超声造影表现及与手术病理的对照分析[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(6):438-441. 被引量:11
  • 2任小龙,周晓东,郑敏娟,张民,李利,孔洁,何光彬,王磊,王莉,秦海英.超声造影在子宫肌瘤与腺肌瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(10):770-772. 被引量:23
  • 3黄丽萍,解丽梅,唐少珊,刘守君.实时超声造影对肝脏恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断的应用研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(2):134-136. 被引量:28
  • 4Guzel AI, Kuyumcuoglu U, Erdemoglu M. Adnexal masses in postm- enopausal and reproductive age women [ J ]. J Exp Ther Oncol, 2011,9 (2) :167 -9.
  • 5Moore RG, Miller MC, Disilvestro P, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011,118(2 Pt 1 ) :280 -288.
  • 6Van Gorp T, Veldman J, Van Calster B, et al. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses[ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012,48 ( 11 ) : 1649 - 1656.
  • 7Tripathy SN.Infertility and pregnancy outcome in female gentialtuberculosis.IntJ Gynaecol Obstet,2002,76 (2):159-163.
  • 8de Vynck WE,Kruger TF,Joubert JJ,et al.Gentialtuberculosis associated with female infertility in the western Cape.S AfrMedJ,1990,77 (12):630-631.
  • 9李雪丹,高思佳,关丽明.女性结核性盆腔炎的CT特征[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(6):415-418. 被引量:15
  • 10Tripathy SN. Infertility and pregnancy outcome in female gential tu- berculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002, 76(2) : 159 -1 63.

引证文献11

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部