期刊文献+

胰体尾切除术后胰腺残端处理对胰液漏发生的影响 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰体尾切除术后胰腺残端的不同处理方式对胰液漏发生的影响。方法回顾性分析2000年至2009年上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的124例行胰体尾切除术患者的临床资料。2000年至2005年,患者行单纯间断褥式缝合处理胰腺残端(单纯组,63例);2006年至2009年,患者行改良的主胰管缝扎+间断褥式交锁缝合处理胰腺残端(联合组,6l例)。比较两组患者术后胰液漏发生情况、住院时间和医疗费用等指标。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用×。检验。结果单纯组患者术后胰液漏发生率为35%(22/63),其中高流量胰液漏10例,住院时间(52±8)d,医疗费用(66400±7450)元;联合组患者术后胰液漏发生率为15%(9/61),无高流量胰液漏患者,住院时问(16±5)d,医疗费用(28000±2530)元,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(X^2=7.24、3.17,t=2.89、2.93,P〈0.05)。结论主胰管缝扎+间断褥式交锁缝合法能有效减少术后胰液漏和高流量胰液漏的发生,缩短术后住院时间及降低医疗费用。
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第6期456-457,共2页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg,2005,92 (5) :539-546.
  • 2Murakami H, Yasue M. A vertical, stomach reconstruction after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg, 2001,181 (2) :149-152.
  • 3Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of inta-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg,2003,237( 1 ) :57-65.
  • 4Abe N, Sugiyama M, Yanagida O, et al. Wrapping of skeletonized and divided vessels using falciform ligament in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg,2007,194( l ) :94-97.
  • 5Yeo C J, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancteaticogastrostomy versus panereaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg,1995,222(4) :580-592.

同被引文献59

  • 1徐彬,靳大勇,宋永蔚,牛耿明,戎叶飞,楼文晖.胰腺切除术后腹腔感染的菌谱分析及治疗体会[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(5):401-402. 被引量:3
  • 2姜洪池,潭洪涛,赵玉沛.胰腺病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:215-219.
  • 3Bentrem D J, Yeh J J, Brennan MF, et al. Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pan- ereaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2005, 9(9): 1307- 1312.
  • 4Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistola rate af- ter pancreatic resection: the importance of definitions [J]. Dig Surg, 2004, 21(1):54-59.
  • 5Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, et al. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(3): 443-451.
  • 6Joseph NE, Singurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Accuracy of de- terming nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Onco1,2003,10 (3) :213-218.
  • 7Bassi C, Dervenis C, Burturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 2005,138( 1 ) :8-13.
  • 8Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factor,outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg,2008,143 (10) :956-965.
  • 9Warshaw AL, Brugge WR, Lewandrowski KB, et al. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 35-2003. A 75-year-old man with a cystic lesion of the pancreas. N Engl J Med,2003,349(20) :1954-1961.
  • 10Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, et al. Risk analysis of pancre- atic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg, 1998,133 (10) :1094-1098.

引证文献7

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部