论《联合国海洋法公约》中的“谈判”与“交换意见”义务被引量：4

下载PDF

导出

摘要《联合国海洋法公约》第十五部分第一节"一般规定"与第二节"导致有拘束力裁判的强制措施程序"之间有着适用上的先后顺序,即只有当第一部分的争端解决方式已用尽的前提下,当事方才可以提交第二节具有管辖权的法院或者法庭。谈判作为传统解决争端的方法在《公约》中同样存有一席之地,但除在海洋划界之外,谈判在没有协议约束基础上,并不是争端解决前置程序;而作为《公约》第二百八十三条规定的"交换意见"义务,并意味着当事方需一致同意方能进入第十五部分第二节的强制程序,当双方诚信地履行了该义务之后,任何一方就有权利单方提起有拘束力裁判的强制措施,但是对于如何界定双方实质履行了该义务,在国际上则标准不一。另外,在第二百八十三条与《公约》第七十四、八十三条之间的关系上,在履行了七十四条与第八十三条的谈判义务之后,并无必要再履行第二百八十三条规定的交换义务。

作者葛冠群

机构地区中国政法大学国际法学院

出处《研究生法学》 2011年第5期92-99,共8页 Graduate Law Review

关键词谈判交换意见《联合国海洋法公约》谈判僵局

分类号 D993.5 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1杨永红.分散的权力:从MOX Plant案析国际法庭管辖权之冲突[J].法学家,2009(3):107-114. 被引量：12
2[日]松井芳郎等著,辛崇阳译.国际法[M]. 中国政法大学出版社, 2004
3.Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v.Singapore),Provisional Measures,Response of the Republic of Singapore[]..
4.Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor(Malaysia v.Singapore)[].ITLOSNo(Order of Oct).2003
5.Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor(Malaysia v.Singapore)[].ITLOSNo(Order of Oct).2003
6.Southern Bluefin Tuna(New Zealand v.Japan;Australia v.Japan),Provisional Measures,Order of27Au-gust1999[].ITLOS Reports.1999
7.Barbados v Trinidad and Tobago,Award of the Arbitral Tribunal[]..
8.
9.
10.Southern Bluefin Tuna(New Zealand v.Japan;Australia v.Japan),Provisional Measures,Order of27August1999[].ITLOS Reports.1999

二级参考文献32

1赵海峰.略论国际司法机构的现状和发展趋势[J].人民司法,2005(9):94-98. 被引量：12
2吴慧.国际海洋法争端解决机制对钓鱼岛争端的影响[J].国际关系学院学报,2007(4):22-33. 被引量：19
3G.Hafner, "Risks Ensuring from Fragmentation of International Law", Official Records of the C.enera/Assembly (A/55/10), annex.
4G. Harrier, "Pro or Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law", 2.5 Michigan Journal of International law (2004), p. 849.
5A.Cassese, International Law, (2nd ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.144-150.
6Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Fragmentation of law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law, pp.415 - 435.
7Tullio Treves, "Conflicts between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the International Court of Justice", 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (1999), pp.809-821.
8C.Romano, The Profliferation of Intemational Judicial Bodies: the Pieces and the Puzzle, 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Policies (1999), p.709.
9Prosecutor v.Tadic, "Decision on the Defense Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction", Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Former Yugo. (1995), p. 11.
10ITLOS, MOX Plant, Request for Provisional Measures, available at http://www.itlos.org.