期刊文献+

论恶意透支信用卡诈骗罪的本质特征——罪与非罪区别界限在于有无非法占有目的

On the essential characteristics of crime of malicious overdraft credit card fraud——Difference between crime and noncrime is whether have the purpose of illegal possession
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从信用卡透支行为的法定形态说起,又从刑法第196条的文字含义、最高人民法院出台司法解释、犯罪构成理论诸方面,论证恶意透支行为,必须坚持以非法占有为目的的定罪原则;再从非法占有目的的特征讲起,联系司法实践中出现的错判案例,提出如何准确认定非法占有目的。 From the legal form of credit card overdraft,and from the meaning of the text 196 of the criminal law,the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme Court and the theories that constitute a crime,to discuss the malicious overdraft that must adhere to the principle of the purpose of illegal possession;from the characteristics of the purpose of illegal possession,with the miscarriage cases in the judicial practice, put forward how to accurately identify the purpose of illegal possession.
作者 于国光
出处 《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》 2011年第4期13-16,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词 正常透支-合法行为 违约透支-侵权行为 恶意透支-犯罪行为 normal overdraftlawful act breach overdraftviolation malicious over-draftcrime
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部