期刊文献+

应用基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱鉴定常见细菌和酵母菌 被引量:27

Identification of bacteria and fungi by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用MALDI—TOFMS鉴定临床常见病原菌。方法复苏560株临床分离株,其中革兰阳性细菌(G^+)260株、革兰阴性细菌(G^-)180株、酵母菌60株、肠道致病菌60株。MALDI—TOFMS鉴定结果与Vitek2Compact全白动微生物鉴定系统比对,结果差异菌株采用16SrDNA测序验证。结果MALDI—TOFMS与Vitek2Compact鉴定结果比较,G^+细菌鉴定符合率为94.6%(246/260),G^-细菌鉴定符合率为96.7%(174/180),酵母菌鉴定符合率为95.0%(57/60),肠道致病菌鉴定符合率为93.3%(56/60)。15株鉴定结果不符的菌株经16SrDNA测序确认,结果与Vitek2Compact和MALDI—TOFMS鉴定符合率分别为26.7%(4/15)和66.7%(10/15)。结论MALDI—TOFMS可用于常见病原微生物鉴定,其快速、低成本的特点具有推广价值。 Objective To identify the pathogenic microorganism by MALDI-TOF MS. Methods A total of 560 strains were resuscitated, which included 260 gram-positive bacteria strains, 180 gram-negative bacteria strains, 60 yeast-like-fungi strains and 60 enteropathogenic bacteria strains. Comparing MALDI-TOF MS with Vitek2 Compact, the discordant resuhs were validated by 16S rDNA sequencing. Results Comparing MALDI-TOF MS with Vitek2 Compact, the coincidence rate was 94. 6% (246/260) for gram-positive bacteria, 96.7% (174/180) for gram-negative bacteria,95% (57/60) for yeast-like-fungi, and 93.3% (56/60) for enteropathogenic bacteria. Fifteen strains were validated by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. Comparing with sequencing, the coincidence rate of two methods was 66. 7% (10/15) for MALDI-TOF MS and 26. 7% (4/11) for Vitek2 Compact, respectively. Conclusion MALDI-TOF MS shows rapid turnaround time and modest reagent costs, and it will be another effective tool for microorganism diagnosis.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期988-992,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30970126)
关键词 细菌 酵母菌 光谱法 质量 基质辅助激光解吸电离 Bacteria Yeasts Spectrometry,mass,matrix-assisted laser resorption-ionization
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ. High-throughputidentification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight spectrometry inconventional medical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48:900-907.
  • 2Claydon MA, Davey SN, Edwards-Jones V, et al. The rapid identification of intact microorganisms using mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol, 1996, 14 : 1584-1586.
  • 3Krishnamurthy T, Ross PL. Rapid identification of bacteria by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization spectrometric analysis of whole cells. Rapid Commun MassSpectrom, 1996, 10 : 1992-1996.
  • 4Seng P, Drancourt M, Gourict F, et al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. ClinInfect Dis, 2009, 49:543-551.
  • 5袁梁,鲁辛辛,耿佳靖.16S rDNA鉴定标本中病原菌的关键技术研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2009,32(4):466-468. 被引量:3
  • 6其布勒哈斯,田世民,邹明强,贺银凤,陈艳,赵贵明.MALDI-TOF质谱技术分析与鉴定病原细菌研究[J].微生物学通报,2009,36(3):416-426. 被引量:20
  • 7刘海洪,杜宗敏,杨瑞馥.MALDI TOF MS在细菌检测和鉴定中的应用[J].微生物学免疫学进展,2003,31(2):47-53. 被引量:20
  • 8Mellmann A, Cloud J, Maier T, et al. Evaluation of matrix- assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for speciesidentification of nonfermenfing bacteria. J Clin Microbiol, 2008, 46 : 1946-1954.
  • 9Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, et al. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identificationfor routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48 : 1169-1175.
  • 10Wunschel SC, Jarman KH, Petersen CE, et al. Bacterial analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry : an inter-laboratory comparison. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 2005, 16:456-462.

二级参考文献65

  • 1孙宗科,张伟,陈西平.应用飞行时间质谱仪快速鉴定细菌的初步研究[J].卫生研究,2004,33(5):552-554. 被引量:14
  • 2吴多加,李凤琴.在食品微生物检测和鉴定中应用的一种质谱新技术[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(5):361-363. 被引量:6
  • 3郭斌,吴晓磊,钱易.提高微生物可培养性的方法和措施[J].微生物学报,2006,46(3):504-507. 被引量:57
  • 4Fenselau C, Demirev PA. Characterization of intact microorganisms by MALDI mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 2001, 20(4): 157-171.
  • 5Phan-Thanh L, Mahouin F. A proteomic approach to study the acid response in Listeria monocytogenes. Electrophoresis, 1999, 20(11): 2214-2224.
  • 6Bernardo K, Pakulat N, Macht M, et al. Identification and discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics, 2002, 2(6): 747-753.
  • 7Johanna EC, Faith AH. Discrimination between wild- type and ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2007, 389(5): 1558-1565.
  • 8Demirev PA, Lin JS, Pineda F, et al. Bioinformatics and mass spectrometry for microorganism identification: proteome-wide post-translational modifications and database search algorithms for characterization of intact H. pylori. Analytical Chemistry, 2001, 73(19): 4566-4573.
  • 9Liu YC, Li YB. Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using immunomagnetic separation and absorbance measurement. Journal of microbiological methods, 2002, 51(3):369-377.
  • 10Wunschel SC, Jarman KH, Petersen CE, et al. Bacterial analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an inter-laboratory comparison. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2005, 16(4): 456-462.

共引文献48

同被引文献344

  • 1陈文燕,王成彬.MALDI-TOF MS在临床细菌鉴定中的应用[J].临床检验杂志(电子版),2014(4):724-729. 被引量:2
  • 2蒋娟娟,冯芳.基质辅助激光解吸离子化中的基质和基质添加剂[J].药学进展,2004,28(8):349-354. 被引量:8
  • 3陈文标,佘菲菲.细菌对喹诺酮类药物耐药机制的研究进展[J].检验医学与临床,2007,4(3):200-201. 被引量:6
  • 4李萍 谢在梅 廷文梅.胸水中分离出地衣芽孢杆菌.中华检验医学杂志,1996,:141-141.
  • 5Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2008, 21 ( 3 ) :538-582.
  • 6Munoz-Price LS, Weinstein RA. Acinetobacter infection. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(12) :1271-1281.
  • 7Vashist J, Tiwari V, Das R, et al. Analysis of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Indian J Med Res, 2011, 133(3) :332-338.
  • 8Doi Y, Husain S, Potoski BA, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg Infect Dis, 2009, 15 (6) : 980- 982.
  • 9Bouvet PJM, Grimont PAD. Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with the recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov.,Acinetobacter haernolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonli sp. nov. , and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 1986, 36 ( 2 ) : 228-240.
  • 10Janssen P, Maquelin K, Coopman R, et al. Discrimination of Acinetobacter genomie species by AFLP fingerprinting, lnt J Syst Bacteriol, 1997, 47 (4) : 1179-! !87.

引证文献27

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部