期刊文献+

上海地区青少年正畸治疗需要的调查研究 被引量:13

Normative orthodontic treatment need and perception of dental attractiveness of 11 to 13 years old schoolchildren in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查上海地区青少年人群的正畸治疗需要及自身美学评价。方法:随机抽取上海地区11~13岁青少年686例(男355例,女331例),由正畸专科医师采用正畸治疗需要指数(index of orthodontic treatment need,IOTN)评定受试者正畸治疗需要。IOTN包括学(dental health component,DHC)及美学(aesthetic component,AC)2部分。同时采用IOTN的美学部分让受试者对自身美观程度进行评价(self-perceived aesthetic component,SAC)。采用描述性统计及卡方检验对调查结果进行统计分析。结果:DHC评分显示26.0%的受试者明确需要正畸治疗,19.8%的受试者为临界病例;AC评分显示5.5%的受试者明确需要正畸治疗,31.7%为临界病例;SAC评分显示1.7%的受试者明确需要正畸治疗,6.4%为临界病例。在明确需要正畸治疗的受试者中,最常见的特征是严重接触点异常(>4 mm)。DHC与AC在评价治疗需要时77.8%结果一致,AC与SAC在评价治疗需要时65.0%结果一致。结论:将近一半的青少年人群明确需要正畸治疗或为临界病例,受试者在进行自身美观程度评价有从轻的倾向。 Objective: To assess the normative orthodontic treatment need and self-perceived dental attractiveness of 11 to 13 years old schoolchildren in Shanghai.Methods: 686 schoolchildren aged 11~13 years in Shanghai were randomly selected.The orthodontic treatment need was evaluated through the Dental Health Component(DHC) and Aesthetic Component(AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need(IOTN).The schoolchildren rated themselves on the AC of IOTN to represent their self-perceived dental attractiveness(SAC).Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis with statistical significance set at P0.05.Results: 26.0% of the children had a definite need for orthodontic treatment according to DHC.Severe contact point displacement of more than 4 mm(7.7%) was the most common occlusal feature in the definite treatment need group.The percentage of the schoolchildren with AC grades 8~10 was 5.5% whereas the percentage of them with SAC grades 8~10 was 1.7%.Conclusion: About half Shanghai schoolchildren aged 11~13 years old need orthodontic treatment,SAC evaluation is less strong than AC.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期813-817,共5页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 上海市重点学科建设项目资助(编号:S30206)
关键词 正畸治疗需要指数 自身[牙合]美观评价 Index of orthodontic treatment need(IOTN) Self-perceived aesthetic component(SAC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Kerosuo H, Kerosuo E, Niemi M, et al. The need for treatment and satisfaction with dental appearance among young finnish adults with and without a history of orthodontic treatment[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2000, 61(5):330-340.
  • 2Hassan AH. Orthodontie treatment needs in the western region of saudi arabia: A research report [ J ]. Head Face Med, 2006, 2(2):1-6.
  • 3Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1989, 11 (3) : 309 - 320.
  • 4Richmond S, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Use of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre-and post-appliance therapy [ J]. Br J Orthod, 1994, 21(2) :175 - 184.
  • 5Lindauer S J, Thresher AA, Baird BW, et al. Orthodontic treatment priority : A comparison of two indices [ J].J Clin Pediatr Dent, 1998, 22(2) :125 -131.
  • 6Grainger RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index [J]. Vital Health Stat 2, 1967, 25:1 -49.
  • 7Salzmann JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority[ J]. Am J Orthod, 1968, 54(10) : 749 - 765.
  • 8Summers CJ. The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring ocelusal disorders[J]. Am J Orthod, 1971, 59(6) :552 -567.
  • 9Richmond S, Shaw WC, O' Brien KD, et al. The development of the PAR Index ( peer assessment Rating) : Reliability and validity[ J]. Eur J Orthod, 1992, 14(2) :125 - 139.
  • 10Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ, et al. Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries [J]. J Public Health Dent, 1989, 49(3):163 -166.

同被引文献103

引证文献13

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部