期刊文献+

不同耳鸣频率患者的临床特征比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the Clinical Characteristics of Tinnitus in Patients with Different Frequency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同耳鸣频率患者的临床特征及其严重程度。方法:70例以主观性耳鸣为主诉的耳鸣患者,按其耳鸣频率的高低分为3组:高音调(4 000~8 000 Hz)组42例,中音调(1 000~3 000 Hz)组16例,低音调(125~750 Hz)组12例。所有入选患者均行纯音听阈测定、耳鸣匹配检查,同时由患者填写耳鸣残疾评估量表(tinnitus handicap inventory,THI)及视觉模拟量表(visual-analogue scale,VAS)。结果:不同耳鸣频率患者的耳鸣部位、耳鸣音调、响度及听力状况构成比较无显著差异;不同耳鸣频率患者其THI评分及VAS评分关系密切。结论:不同耳鸣频率患者耳鸣匹配结果及其自我评分关系密切,临床上可以相互结合运用于临床耳鸣严重程度的评价。 Objective:To observe the clinical characteristics of patients with tinnitus in different frequency. Methods: A total of 70 patients with tinnitus were enrolled in this study. All the patients were received matching test. Tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) and visual-analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires were investigated. Results: There was no significant correlation between the side, pitch, tinnitus loudness and the hearing in tinnitus patients with different frequency; However, there was correlation between THI and VAS scores. Conclusions: Combined with the tinnitus matching test, it can be used in clinical evaluating of the tinnitus patients.
出处 《中国临床医学》 2011年第5期670-671,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 广东省中医药局课题(编号:2010149)
关键词 频率 耳鸣匹配 耳鸣残疾评估量表 视觉模拟量表 Frequency Tinnitus matching test Tinnitus handicap inventory Visual-analogue scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1David Jiang.耳鸣及其美国的诊治指导方案[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2005,34(1):58-61. 被引量:69
  • 2石秋兰,卜行宽,王俊国,陆玲,徐霞,刘丞.耳鸣致残量表中文版的研译与临床应用[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(5):476-479. 被引量:119
  • 3Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JW, Graham RL. NeurophysiologicaI model of tinnitus:dependce of the minimal masking level on treatment outcome[J]. Hear Res, 1994, 80(2):216-232.
  • 4Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Oliveira Pde M. Correlation analysis of the visual-analogue scale and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory in tinnitus patients [J].Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2009,75(1) :76-79.

二级参考文献50

  • 1徐霞,卜行宽.耳鸣的流行病学研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2005,3(2):136-139. 被引量:62
  • 2[1]Evaluation Guidelines
  • 3[3]Andersson G, Lyttkens L, Larsen HC (1999) Distinguishing levels of tinnitus distress. Clin-Otolaryngol. 24(5): 404-10.
  • 4[4]Baguley DM, Stoddart RL, Hodgson C (in press ) Convergent validity of the Tinnitus Handicap inventory and the Tinnitus Questionnaire.Journal of Laryngology and Otology.
  • 5[5]Burns EM (1984) A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli. Audiol 23:426-440.
  • 6[6]Douek E, Reid J (1966) The diagnostic value of tinnitus pitch. J Laryngol Otol 82: 1039-1042.
  • 7[7]Goodwin PE, Johnson RM (1980b) The loudness of tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol 90: 353-359.
  • 8[8]Hallam RS, Jakes SC, Chambers C, Hinchcliffe R (1985) A comparison of different methods for assessing the 'intensity' of tinnitus.Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) 99: 501-506.
  • 9[9]Henry JA, Flick CL, Gilbert AM, Ellingson RM, Fausti SA (1999) Reliability of tinnitus loudness matches under procedural variation. J Amer Acad Audiol 10:502-520.
  • 10[10]Jakes SC, Hallam RC, Chambers CC, Hinchcliffe R (1966) Matched and self-reported loudness of tinnitus: methods and sources of error. Audiol 25:92-100.

共引文献184

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部