期刊文献+

不同旋转器械对基牙牙本质表面粗糙度及显微形貌的影响 被引量:4

Effect of different rotary instruments on the roughness and microtopography of abutment dentin surfaces
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价不同旋转器械对基牙牙本质表面粗糙度及显微形貌的影响,为临床牙体预备过程中旋转器械的选择使用提供参考。方法选择54颗离体牙,均分为3组,使用不同的预备方式对唇面进行预备。A组:标准金刚砂车针预备;B组:标准金刚砂车针预备,极细粒度金刚砂车针修整;C组:标准金刚砂车针预备,钨钢车针修整。之后用粗糙度仪测定牙本质表面粗糙度(Ra、Rq和Rz),并进行扫描电镜观察,对其结果进行统计学处理。结果 3种预备方式后的牙本质表面粗糙度Ra存在显著差异(P<0.05);粗糙度由大到小依次为:A组>B组>C组。结论不同旋转器械切磨牙本质所得表面粗糙度不同,使用极细粒度金刚砂车针和钨钢车针修整可获得较为光滑的牙体预备体表面。 Objective To evaluate the effect of different rotary instruments on the roughness and microtopography of abutment dentine surface,and to provide reference to the use of rotary instrument in tooth preparation.Methods Labial surface of 54 human teeth was prepared by different preparation methods:Group A:prepared with the standard diamond;Group B: finished with fine-particle diamond after prepared with the standard diamond;Group C: finished with carbide bur after prepared with the standard diamond.Surface roughness(Ra,Rq and Rz) was tested using a profilometer,followed by observation under SEM.Results The three surface preparation methods resulted in significant differences in surface roughness(P〈0.05).The descending order of the roughness was Group A,Group B,and Group C.Conclusion The surface roughness of abutment dentine prepared with different rotary instruments were different.The two different finishing methods both can decrease the roughness of the dentine after prepared with the standard diamond and can receive relatively smooth surface.
作者 周金阔 隋磊
出处 《现代口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第6期446-449,共4页 Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词 牙体预备 牙本质 粗糙度 显微形貌 Tooth preparation Dentin Roughness Microtopography
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102(6): 354-361.
  • 2Field J, Waterhouse P, German M. Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro. J Dent, 2010, 38(3): 182-190.
  • 3周秋凤,无.GB/T1031—2009《产品几何技术规范(GPS)表面结构 轮廓法 表面粗糙度参数及其数值》介绍[J].机械工业标准化与质量,2010(3):30-32. 被引量:10
  • 4程静涛,郭天文,肖惠军,刘鹏,于世宾,轩东英.不同预备程序对基牙表面粗糙度的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2001,17(6):524-526. 被引量:5
  • 5Song XF, Yin L. The quantitative effect of diamond grit size on the subsurface damage induced in dental adjustment of porce- lain surfaces. P I Mech Eng H, 2010, 224(10): 1185-1194.
  • 6李雅卿,陈吉华,王辉,沈丽娟,王迎捷.车针粒度对预备牙体与水门汀粘固强度的影响[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2008,9(1):9-10. 被引量:10
  • 7Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of dental ro- tary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102(2): 81-88.
  • 8Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. The effects of tooth preparation cleans- ing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper Dent, 2008, 33 (5): 556-563.
  • 9Ayad MF. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. J Prosthodont, 2009, 18(2): 145-151.
  • 10Tao J, Yoda M, Kimura K, et al. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-l.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(5): 397-404.

二级参考文献44

共引文献42

同被引文献35

  • 1李成贵,董申.3D表面粗糙度的测量方法分析[J].航空精密制造技术,1999,35(2):36-40. 被引量:3
  • 2李治伟,周平,金洙吉.粗糙薄层弹性体接触刚度分析[J].摩擦学学报,2015,35(1):53-58. 被引量:4
  • 3翁维民,张修银,张富强.黏结时间对树脂黏结剂剪切强度的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2007,16(5):527-529. 被引量:6
  • 4吴伟力,张修银.全瓷冠边缘适合性研究进展[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2007,16(4):200-204. 被引量:21
  • 5Li YQ, Wang H, Wang Y J, et al. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the re- tention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(2):86-93.
  • 6Heintze SD. Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to eval- uate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents[J]. Dent Ma- ter, 2010, 26(3):193-206.
  • 7Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102(2):81-88.
  • 8Ayad MF. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extraeoronal restorations[J]. J Prosthodont, 2009, 18(2):145-151.
  • 9Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, et al. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system[J]. Dent Mater, 2003, 19(8):758-767.
  • 10Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, et al. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2000, 83(4):459-465.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部