期刊文献+

改进荧光原位杂交技术快速产前诊断常见染色体异常 被引量:7

Optimized procedure for fluorescence in situ hybridization in rapid prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改进荧光原位杂交(fluorescenceinsituhybridization,FISH)技术,快速产前诊断羊水间期细胞常见染色体异常的临床应用可行性。方法改进FISH杂交过程的处理方法和探针杂交液用量,对300例羊水间期细胞进行FISH检测,以羊水细胞培养、核型分析作为结果验证。结果300例羊水样本,FISH检出17例异常:7例21三体、4例18三体、2例X、I例XXY、1例XXX、1例XYY、I例三倍体,与羊水细胞核型分析结果完全符合。结论改进FISH技术后检测的准确性、特异性没有受到影响,且检测成本明显降低,可以在临床推广应用于快速产前诊断常见染色体异常。 Objective To optimize the procedure of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and evaluate it in rapid prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidy. Methods Amniotic fluid samples from 300 pregnant women were tested by both interphase FISH and conventional cell culture for karyotyping from September 2009 and September 2010. Results Seven cases of trisomy 21, 4 of trisomy 18, 2 of monosomy X, 1 of XXY, 1 of XXX, and 1 of triploidy were detected by FISH in the 300 amniotic fluid samples. It was concordant with the results from conventional karyotype analysis. The concordance rate was 100%. Conclusion Through a technical modification of FISH procedure, the detection accuracy and specificity was not affected but testing cost reduced greatly. It can be used in rapid prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidy.
出处 《中华医学遗传学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期658-660,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
基金 基金项目:广东省医学科研基金(BZOI0031)
关键词 荧光原位杂交 快速产前诊断 染色体异常 fluorescence in situ hybridization rapid prenatal diagnosis aneuploidy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dickinson JE, Harcourt E, Murch A. The selective use of rapid aneuploidy screening in prenatal diagnosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 49:28-33.
  • 2Moatter T, Khilji Z, Murad F, et al. Analysis of amniotic fluid specimens for common chromosome disorders using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Pak Med Assoc, 2007, 57: 189-192.
  • 3Thein AT, Abdel-Fattah SA, Kyle PM, et al. An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogeneties in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn, 2000, 20:275-280.
  • 4Eiben B, Trawicki W, Hammans W, et al. A prospective comparative study on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of uncultured amniocytes and standard karyotype analysis. Prenat Diagn, 1998, 18: 901-906.
  • 5刘晗,廖灿,黄以宁,潘敏,易翠兴,袁思敏,胡舜妍,钟惠珠.应用优化荧光原位杂交技术诊断110例羊水间期细胞常见非整倍体[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2010,27(4):453-456. 被引量:13
  • 6Wittern I, Devriendt K, Legius E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluoreseence in situ hybridization (FISH). Prenat Diagn, 2002, 22..29-33.
  • 7Locatelli A, Mariani S, Ciriello E, et al. Role of FISH on uncultured amniocytes for the diagnosis of aneuploidies in the presence of fetal anomalies. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2005, 20:1-4.
  • 8Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, et al. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) : 2- year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn, 2001, 21:702-704.
  • 9Caine A, Maltby AE, Parkin CA, et al. Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13,18,and 21 by FISH without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment. Lancet, 2005,366 : 123-128.
  • 10Homer J, Bhatt S, Hoang B, et al. Residual risk for eytogenetic abnormalities after prenatal diagnosis by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Prenat Diagn, 2003, 23:566-571.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Dickinson JE,Harcourt E,Murch A.The selective use of rapid aneuploidy screening in prenatal diagnosis.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2009,49:28-33.
  • 2Leung WC,Waters JJ,Chitty L.Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping:a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.Prenat Diagn,2004,24:790-795.
  • 3Writters I,Devriendt K,Legius E,et al.Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).Prenat Diag,2002,22:29-33.
  • 4Locatelli A,Mariani S,Ciriello E,et al.Role of FISH on uncultured amniocytes for the diagnosis of aneuploidies in the presence of fetal anomalies.Fetal Diagn Ther,2005,20:1-4.
  • 5Luquet I,Mugneret F,Athis PD,et al.French multi-centric study of 2000 amniotic fluid interphase FISH analyses from highrisk pregnancies and review of the literature.Ann Genet,2002,45:77-88.
  • 6Wyandt HE,Tonk VS,Huang XL,et al.Correlation of abnormal rapid FISH and chromosome results from amniocytes for prenatal diagnosis.Fetal Diagn Ther,2006,21:235-240.
  • 7Caine A,Maltby AE,Parkin CA,et al.Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13,18,and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype:a cytogenetic risk assessment.Lancet,2005,366:123-128.
  • 8Leung WC,Waters JJ,Chitty L.Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping:a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.Prenat Diagn,2004.24:790-795.
  • 9Kagan KO,Chitty LS,Cicero S,et al.Ultrasound findings before amniocentesis in selecting the method of analysing the sample.Prenat Diagn,2007,27:34-39.
  • 10Leclercq S,Lebbar A,Grange G,et al.Optimized criteria for using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies.Prenat Diagn,2008,28:313-318.

共引文献12

同被引文献52

  • 1夏家辉,刘培德.医学遗传学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:20.
  • 2Gardner R J M, Sutherland G R, Chromosome abnormalitiesand genetic counseling [ M]. New York: Oxford UniversityPress,1996:300-320.
  • 3Klinger K,Landes G,Shook D,et al. Rapid detection of chro-mosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluo-rescence in situ hybridization (F1SH)[J]. Am J Hum Genet,1992,51(1):55-65.
  • 4Mansfield E S. Diagnosis of Down Syndrome and other aneu-ploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and smalltandem repeat polymorphisms [J]. Hum Mol Genet, 1993,2(1):43-50.
  • 5Mann K, Donaghue C, Fox S P, et al. Strategies for the rapidprenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy[J]. Eur J HumGenet,2004,12(11) :907-915.
  • 6Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangementsand extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagno-sis j clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints[J]. AmJ Hum Genet,1991,49(5.) :9952-10131 .
  • 7Szczepura A K, Kankaanpa J. Assessment of healthcare tech-nologies: case studies, key concepts and strategic issues[R].Chichester:John Wiley, 1996.
  • 8Leung W C, Waters J J,Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis by rapidaneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study ofthe role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocente-sis[J]. Prenat Diagn,2004,24(10) : 790-795.
  • 9UKNEQAS. NEQAS: National External Quality AssessmentScheme in clinical cytogenetics[R]. London:United KingdomNational External Quality Assessment Service,2000.
  • 10Rickman L, Fiegler H, Carter NP, et al. Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH[J]. Eur J MedGenet, 2005, 48: 232-240.

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部