期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比分析 被引量:10

Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy for appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的手术效果和优缺点。方法:将150例急性阑尾炎患者分为腹腔镜组(75例)和开放组(75例),比较两组手术的临床指标及术后随访情况。结果:两组手术均顺利完成。腹腔镜组和开放组手术时间分别为31.1±2.1 min和31.1±1.8 min(t=0.00,P>0.05);术中出血量分别为16.2±2.8 mL和28.3±5.3 mL(t=64.62,P<0.05);术后下床活动时间分别为25.1±3.1 h及50.5±2.1 h(t=69.02,P<0.05);术后排气时间分别为29.6±1.6 h和52.1±4.6 h(t=10.92,P<0.05);住院时间分别为3.1±0.8 d及7.9±1.3 d(t=73.42,P<0.05);综合费用分别为6393±42元和4861±33元(t=-12.19,P<0.05);切口感染率分别为0和2%(χ2=25.40,P<0.05);止痛药使用频率分别为4%和32%(χ2=31.63,P<0.05)。随访时间为1~6月(平均3.1)月,切口疝的发生率均为0。结论:腹腔镜治疗急性阑尾炎具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和平均住院时间短等优点,是治疗急性阑尾炎较为理想的手术方式。 Objective: To compare laparoscopic appendectomy to conventional operation for the treatment of appendicitis, Methods: In this study 150 patients diagnosed as appendicitis were divided into group A(laparoscopic appendectomy) and group B(conventional operation) according to the random numbers. In group A, 75 patients were treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. In group B, 75 patients were treated with conventional open appendectomy. The inhospital data and that of followed-up were compared. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS16.0 for Win- dows. Comparisons between categorical variables and continuous variables were analyzed using the ~ 2 test and t test. Results: The operation was successfully performed in all 300 patients. The operating time in group A and B were (31.1 ± 2.1)min versus (31.1± 1.8) min (t=0.00, P〉0.05), the blood loss were (16.2 ±2.8)mL versus (28.3± 5.3)mL (t=64.62, P〈0.05),the bed off activity time were(25.1± 3.1)h versus (50.5 ± 2.1)h (t=69.02, P〈0.05),the bowels' move time were(29.6 ±1.6)h versus (52.1 ±4.6)h (t=10.92, P〈0.05), the hospital stay were(3.1 ± 0.8)d versus (7.9 ± 1.3)d(t=73. 42, P〈0.05) ,the inhospital cost was (6393 ± 42) yuan versus (4861 ± 33) yuan (t=-12.19, P〈0.05), the incision infection was 0 and 3 (χ2=25.40, P〈0.05). Postoperative analgesics were needed in 4% versus 32% (χ2=31.63,P〈0.05). All the patients were followed-up from 1 months to 6 months (average 3.1 months). The development of incision hernia in group A and B was 0 (P〉0.05). Conclusion; Laparoscopic appendectomy is a therapy of choice for patients with acute appendicitis with advantages of minimal invasion, early recovery, few complications and short hospital stay.
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2011年第10期790-792,808,共4页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
关键词 阑尾炎 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 Appendicitis-AppendectomyoLaparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1向国安,陈开运,高鹏,刘灏,肖方联,劳炜东,谭敏.腹腔镜在急腹症中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(8):651-652. 被引量:36
  • 2谢志荣,蒋邦好,梁伟雄,洪云,冯鉴伦.腹腔镜下阑尾手术与传统开腹手术的比较分析[J].岭南现代临床外科,2007,7(2):155-155. 被引量:23
  • 3许峰峰,肖隆斌,吴文辉,张兴伟,龙硕,谭进富,谭敏.慢性阑尾炎腹腔镜与开腹手术疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(4):359-361. 被引量:35
  • 4吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学(第6版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.827.
  • 5Yagmulu A,Vernon A,Barnhart DC,et al.Laparo-scopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis:a comparison with open appendectomy.Surg Endosc,2006,20:1051-1054.
  • 6Harrell,Andrew G,Lincourt,et al.Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.American Surgeon,2006,72:474-478.
  • 7Namir K,Rodoey J,Mason,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy:A prospective randomized double-blind study.Ann Surg,2005,242:439-450.
  • 8Saad M.Fishermans'technique,introducing a novel method for using the umbilical pert for removal of appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Teeh,2007,17:422-424.
  • 9Serum K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy, 1983,15 : 59- 64.
  • 10Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg, 1999, 177 : 250-256.

共引文献181

同被引文献62

引证文献10

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部