期刊文献+

高强度玻璃离子材料结合非创伤性充填技术应用于乳牙封闭防龋(英文) 被引量:2

High-strength glass ionomer with atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention of deciduous caries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:以往报道的玻璃离子封闭剂耐磨性能差,抗折强度低,合面封闭剂很容易脱落。目的:观察在非创伤性充填技术下高强度玻璃离子应用于幼儿乳牙窝沟封闭的效果。方法:按自身对照的方法,对89名3岁幼儿的左或右半口符合窝沟封闭条件的乳磨牙在非创伤性充填技术下行玻璃离子窝沟封闭,对侧半口符合窝沟封闭条件的乳磨牙作空白对照。结果与结论:非创伤性充填技术下窝沟封闭后6,18个月,玻璃离子完整保留率为94.15%及77.72%。6个月时牙位脱落率:下颌第二乳磨牙>下颌第一乳磨牙>上颌第二乳磨牙>上颌第一乳磨牙,18个月时牙位脱落率:下颌第二乳磨牙>上颌第二乳磨牙>下颌第一乳磨牙>上颌第一乳磨牙。非创伤性充填技术下玻璃离子封闭的乳牙患龋率远低于未作封闭的乳牙,6,18个月时差异均有显著性意义(P<0.01)。提示非创伤性充填技术下高强度玻璃离子窝沟封闭在幼儿乳牙中的脱落率低,操作简单,防龋效果肯定。 BACKGROUND: It has been reported that glass ionomer sealants have a poor wear resistance and low rupture strength that are easy to fall off on the occlusal surfaces. OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of high-strength glass ionomer via the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) on the pit and fissure of deciduous teeth in the young children. METHODS: A self-controlled method was used to compare ART glass ionomer-based pit and fissure seal on unilateral molars with resin sealant on the contralateral side in 89 children aged 3 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The retention rates of ART glass ionomer sealant after 6 and 18 months were 94.15% and 77.72%, respectively. At 6 months after treatment, ART gliass ionomer sealant was more caducous in mandibular second deciduous molars mandibular first deciduous molars maxillary second deciduous molars maxillary first deciduous molars; at 18 months after treatment, the rank was mandibular second deciduous molars maxillary second deciduous molars mandibular first deciduous molars maxillary first deciduous molars. the second deciduous molar of the lower mandible, but the caducous position of resin sealant was the second deciduous molar of the upper mandible. The caries prevalence rate of the deciduous teeth treated with ART glass ionomer sealant was significantly lower than that without sealant at 6 and 18 months (P 0.01). These findings indicate that ART glass ionomer pit and fissure sealant is of a lower drop-out rate, easy to operate and of low cost with excellent caries-preventing effect.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第42期7960-7964,共5页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province,No.2009B030801253,2004B4051003 the Medical Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province,No.A2004117~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Bian JY,Hu DY.Preventive Dentistry.Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2008:159.
  • 2Wang YJ,Xu DM.The clinical observation of pit and fissure sealands preventing and controling decayes on first permanent teeth.Zhongguo Ertong Baojian Zazhi.2003;11(3):217-218.
  • 3Siegal MD,Kumar JV.Workshop on guidelines for sealant use:recommendations.J Public Health Dent.1995;55(special issue):263-273.
  • 4Futatsuki M,Nozawa M,Ogata T,et al.Wear of resin-modified glass ionomers:an in vitro syudy.J Clin Pediat Dent.2001;25(4):297-301.
  • 5Qi XQ.Third national oral cavity healthy epidemiology report of investigation.Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House.2008:60.
  • 6Frencken JE,Makoni F,Sitthole WD.ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe:Survival after 3 years.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.1998;26(6):372.
  • 7Frencken JE,Makoni F,Sitthole WD,et al.Three-year survival of one surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.Caries Res.1998; 32(2):119.
  • 8Wan HC.Clinical observation of ART pit and fissure sealands for 3-years.Shiyong Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi.2004;20(5):603-606.
  • 9Rexford E,Stephen P.Health Economics:Theories,Insights and Industry Studies.Thomson Learning Pte Ltd.2004:59-66.
  • 10World Health Organization.Oral Health Surveys:Basic Methods.4th ed.Geneva:WHO,1997:1-48.

同被引文献22

  • 1秦满,夏斌,刘宏胜.流动性充填材料用于预防性树脂充填的实验研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(3):302-305. 被引量:53
  • 2杨萍,耿发云,周利文,骆伟燕,包年香,姚馨慧.窝沟釉质成形术对封闭剂渗透性及密合性的影响[J].现代预防医学,2005,32(7):717-718. 被引量:1
  • 3余少秋,游耀华.玻璃离子材料窝沟封闭剂的比较研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(17):25-27. 被引量:4
  • 4王玉秀.边缘微渗漏的不良后果及其影响因素[J].包头医学院学报,2007,23(2):228-228. 被引量:4
  • 5Taylor MJ,Lynch E.Microleakage[].Journal of Dentistry.1992
  • 6Park K,Georgescu M,Scherer W,Schulman A.Comparison of shear strength, fracture patterns, and microleakage among unfilled, filled, and fluoride-releasing sealants[].Pediatric Dentistry.1993
  • 7Garcia-Godoy F,de Arau jo FB.Enhancem ent of fissure sealantpenetration and adaptation:the enam eloplasty techn ique[].JC lin PediatrDent.1994
  • 8Sons A L,Chu C Y,Meyers I A.The effect of fissure morphologyand pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion offissure sealants[].Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.1996
  • 9Ansari G,Oloomi K,Eslami B.Microleakage assessment of pit andfissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis[].Int JPaediatr Dent.2004
  • 10Birkenfeld L H,Sehulman A.Enhanced retention of glass-ionomersealant by enamel etching:a microleakage and scanning electron mi-crosopic study[].Quintessence International.1999

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部