期刊文献+

美托洛尔辅小剂量甲状腺激素治疗充血性心力衰竭临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of congestive heart failure treated by metoprolol assisted with low-dose thyroid hormone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察β受体阻滞剂辅用小剂量甲状腺激素治疗充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的疗效,以探讨CHF患者对β受体阻滞剂治疗的耐受性及二药合用的可行性。方法将36例CHF患者随机分为:美托洛尔组(M组)和美托洛尔辅小剂量甲状腺激素组(MT组),M组口服美托洛尔起始量6.25~12.5mg,直至耐受量,MT组在M组的基础上加服甲状腺片10 mg,每日1次,共服3周。心排血量(CO)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末容积(LVESV)和血浆三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)、甲状腺素(T4)、反三碘甲状腺原氨酸(rT3)及促甲状腺激素(TSH),于用药前和用药后3周各检查1次。结果 M组有3例出现低血压反应,其中1例有心力衰竭加重表现;MT组心功能改善和甲状腺激素水平恢复均优于M组,仅1例发生一过性低血压,心功能治疗后MT组与M组比:LVEF(46.23±7.65)%vs(38.72±7.02)%、LVEDV(169.32±45.56)ml vs(199.81±43.13)ml、LVESV(120.56±48.32)ml vs(153.36±47.26)ml、CO(3.86±0.73)L/min vs(3.37±0.63)L/min;甲状腺激素水平治疗后MT组与M组比较:T3(2.32±0.82)nmol/L vs(1.05±0.65)nmol/L、T4(105.32±60.31)nmol/L vs(103.62±52.11)nmol/L、rT3(0.49±0.26)nmol/L vs(0.69±0.31)nmol/L、TSH(5.12±2.43)mU/L vs(5.23±2.65)mU/L。结论美托洛尔辅以小剂量甲状腺素治疗CHF,可取长补短,有利于提高CHF患者对β受体阻滞剂的耐受性。 Objective To observe a -receptor blocker assisted with a small dose of thyroid hormone in treatment of congestive heart failure(CHF),in order to investigate the tolerance of CHF on the β-recepor blocker treatment and the feasibility of two-drug combination. Methods Thirty-six cases of CHF patients were randomly divided into metoprolol group(M group) and metoprolol group secondary small dose of thyroid hormone group(MT group), In M group,the initial dose of oral metoprolol was 6.25-12.5 mg, until the tolerance dose, in MT group, on the basis of conventional therapy,thyroid tablets 10mg, once a day, serving a total of three weeks. Cardiac output (CO), left ventricular ejection fraetion(LVEF) ,left ventrieular end diastolic volume(LVEDV) ,left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and plasma T3 ,T4, rT3 and TSH were inspected before treatment and after treatment three weeks. Results In M group,three cases had hypotension,one of them had clinical symptoms of worsening heart failure In MT group, the improvement of cardiac function and the recovery of thyroid hormone levels were better than those in M group,only 1 case had transient hypotension. In MT group and M group, comparison of cardiac function: LVEF (46.23 ± 7.65)% vs (38. 72±7.02); ,LVEDV (169. 32±45.56) ml vs (199.81±43.13) mh LVESV(120. 56±48. 32) ml vs (153.36±47.26) ml,CO (3.86 ± 0.73) L/min vs (3.37 ± 0.63) L/min; compared thyroid hormone levels.. T3 ( 2.32 ± 0.82 ) nmol/L vs (1. 05±0.65) nmol/L,T4 (105. 32±60.31) nmol/L vs (103.62±52.11) nmol/L,rT3 (0. 49±0; 26) nmol/L vs (0. 695=0.31) nmol/L,TSH(5.12±2. 43) mU/L vs (5. 23±2.65) mU/L. Conclusion Metoprolol combined with low-dose thyroid hormone for CHF, can benefit each other,helping improve the tolerance of CHF patients on β-receptor blockers.
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 2011年第24期2120-2122,共3页 Clinical Focus
关键词 心力衰竭 充血性 肾上腺素能Β受体拮抗剂 甲状腺激素类 heart failure,congestive adrenergic beta-antagonisis^thyroid hormones
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献25

  • 1邢俊杰,邵冰,张湘兰,袁凤贤,邹德玲.心力衰竭病人血甲状腺激素、促甲状腺素的测定及其意义[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2004,13(6):530-532. 被引量:9
  • 2黄家胜.急性心肌梗死治疗前后甲状腺激素变化与心功能的关系[J].实用全科医学,2006,4(5):517-518. 被引量:5
  • 3唐宜耀,刘帆,孙圣明.老年慢性心力衰竭病人甲状腺激素水平的变化及意义[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007,5(3):200-201. 被引量:12
  • 4lelwasi G,Pingitore A,Landi P,et al.Low-T3 syndrome: a strong prognostic predictor of death in patients with heart disease [J]. Circulation, 2003,108:708-713.
  • 5Rodrigo CP,Gilberto PC,Claudia CE,et al.Thyroid hormone profile in acute cornary syndromes[J].Arq Bras Cardiol,2006,87:688-694.
  • 6Lee WY,Suh JY,Kim SW,et al.Circulating IL-8 and IL-10 in euthyroid sick syndromes following bone marrow transplantation [J].Korean Med Sci,2002,17:755 -760.
  • 7徐桂波.急性心肌梗死患者血清甲状腺激素变化及意义.临床心血管病杂志,2004,16(4):153-153.
  • 8Mulvihill NT Foley B,Murphy R,et al.Evidenee of prolonged inflammation in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction [J].JACC,2000,36: 1210-1216.
  • 9Mueller C,Buetter HJ,Hodgson JM,et al.Inflammatory and long-term mortality after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with a very early invasive strategy in 1042 consecutive patients[J.]. Circulation, 2002, 105: 1412-1415.
  • 10Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA ,et al.Incremental prognostic value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention [J].Circulation,2001,104: 992- 997.

共引文献40

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部